Let all be honest and admit that it's rare to find a business that uses over 50% of it's revenue on such a small percent of the employees.
In 2009, General Electric grossed $156.7 Billion in revenue
https://www.ge.com/ar2009/pdf/ge_ar_2009_audited.pdf. Their president and CEO, Jeff Imelt, earned $5,487,155. In other words, the President of CEO grossed about .0035% of the the companies total revenue.
To compare this, the Jazz in 2010 had a total revenue of $121 million
https://www.forbes.com/lists/2010/32/basketball-valuations-11_Utah-Jazz_322274.html. The Jazz, on average, spent $5.5 million on each player. So the average Jazz player walks away with roughly 4.4% of the Jazz's total yearly revenue.
If the Jazz players were paid at a percentage similar to that of the CEO and President of GE, they would make on average $423,500 per year.
I'm not saying it has to go that far, but clearly NBA salaries are out of control compared with how well the league as a whole is doing financially. Not all of the savings needs to go into the owners pocketbook either. How about we lower ticket prices and concession prices? How about we develop a better minor league system to place minor league teams in smaller markets (a better product than the NBDL)? How about the NBA increases the wages of other positions in finance, sales, marketing, HR, maintenance, etc? What does the NBAPA have to say about the families of these employees? How can they survive making $45K per year?