Handlogten's Heros
Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
2020-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
So here's the deal. Its clear we don't care much about the play in. I am not sure we absolutely want to keep our pick or definitely want it to convey. I think what we have done is fine and smart.
So here's the plan - either our young guys will fill valuable roles and keep us out of the bottom 10 or we get a top 10 pick to add to this group. If they play well enough we stay above a few teams (there is like 3.5 games between us and where we need to be to keep the pick) then it means our young guys have shown something and their trade value increases. There are scenarios that suck but there are a lot of "win-win" situations we have now. We also get a more complete look at what we have with the young guys.
I expect some load management, but for the most part I think we play it mostly straight. I'd guess we are bad enough that GS and Houston pass us... not sure on Chicago and Atlanta.
At draft time we are armed with a top 10 pick and/or prospects with more value than they have currently. Its a draft many are low on but might have some big opportunities to trade up.
The summer is a whole different scenario but if we are building around Lauri what gives more value... a top 10 pick in 2024 or a guy drafted in 2025 or 2026? its part of why I never bought the narrative that we really want the pick to convey this year. I think we are cool with it but weren't out to force fetch to happen.
We were cool with the pick conveying if our young guys proved to be good, but not on the backs of vets who may not be in the long term plans. I think its fair and reasonable. I do think I would have moved JC but who knows what the offers really were.
So here's the plan - either our young guys will fill valuable roles and keep us out of the bottom 10 or we get a top 10 pick to add to this group. If they play well enough we stay above a few teams (there is like 3.5 games between us and where we need to be to keep the pick) then it means our young guys have shown something and their trade value increases. There are scenarios that suck but there are a lot of "win-win" situations we have now. We also get a more complete look at what we have with the young guys.
I expect some load management, but for the most part I think we play it mostly straight. I'd guess we are bad enough that GS and Houston pass us... not sure on Chicago and Atlanta.
At draft time we are armed with a top 10 pick and/or prospects with more value than they have currently. Its a draft many are low on but might have some big opportunities to trade up.
The summer is a whole different scenario but if we are building around Lauri what gives more value... a top 10 pick in 2024 or a guy drafted in 2025 or 2026? its part of why I never bought the narrative that we really want the pick to convey this year. I think we are cool with it but weren't out to force fetch to happen.
We were cool with the pick conveying if our young guys proved to be good, but not on the backs of vets who may not be in the long term plans. I think its fair and reasonable. I do think I would have moved JC but who knows what the offers really were.