NAOS
Well-Known Member
Dennis Lindsey is hired by the Utah Jazz and steps into an organization with a power vacuum. This vacuum is the accumulation of (a) the sudden retirement of Jerry Sloan, (b) the death of LHM and the rise of Greggy, (c) the trade of Deron Williams, and (d) the partial retirement of Kevin O'Connor. In the face of this vacuum, the powers that be show every sign of hesitance and conservativeness: sticking with interim Ty Corbin, sticking with botched-Al-Jefferson experiment, re-acquiring washed-up former jazzmen (Mo Williams), etc. And in steps Dennis Lindsey, who is asked to spend his first year observing.
In other words, Dennis isn't invited to seize the reins. He's asked to work with a coach he didn't hire -- who, as we can now see very clearly, plays a different style than Dennis desires. Operationally, Dennis is asked to be an assistant GM to an old-school GM with different connections and philosophies. And, I'm sure he has to learn how to placate to Greggy, a man who has been given everything and is probably worried about fumbling his assets during a challenging transition.
So, Dennis plays the long-game. He lets Kevin get further into retirement on his own terms. And, he lets Corbin make his own bed to lie in. When Corbin can't pass muster, who's left to grab the reins? Dennis.
It's on record that Trey is Corbin's pick. TREY'S FAILURE FURTHER CEMENTS DENNIS PLACE IN THE GAME OF THRONES. That's his secret value. Trey isn't Dennis' mulligan; he's the last sacrifice to the old order. Dennis is now king!!!!!!
THE END!!!!!!!!
EDIT FOR THE HATERS!!:
I'm not saying that DL knew Trey was a bust and was, therefore, throwing away a top-10 pick in a power grab. A senationalist would read my OP in that way. But I do think he was placating with that pick, which he could afford to do because there weren't any other selections that were screamingly obvious at that spot. So, he lets other interests take the 'win' or the 'loss' on that issue and moves his attention elsewhere (Gobert, Neto). It's obvious why he'd do it this way: he can't lose. If Trey is good, then he has a good asset; if he's bad, then he further cements his influence. How many times did he give Ty credit for Trey?!?!?!
I think this kind of story should resonate with anybody who has been a new guy within an organization... Specifically, a new guy who is supposed to have influence, but who is supposed to step into that influence slowly and purposefully, without 'throwing the baby out with the bathwater' so to speak. My Game Of Thrones reference is playful, but not without value... Those dynamics happen!!!!
EDIT FOR ZULU
In other words, Dennis isn't invited to seize the reins. He's asked to work with a coach he didn't hire -- who, as we can now see very clearly, plays a different style than Dennis desires. Operationally, Dennis is asked to be an assistant GM to an old-school GM with different connections and philosophies. And, I'm sure he has to learn how to placate to Greggy, a man who has been given everything and is probably worried about fumbling his assets during a challenging transition.
So, Dennis plays the long-game. He lets Kevin get further into retirement on his own terms. And, he lets Corbin make his own bed to lie in. When Corbin can't pass muster, who's left to grab the reins? Dennis.
It's on record that Trey is Corbin's pick. TREY'S FAILURE FURTHER CEMENTS DENNIS PLACE IN THE GAME OF THRONES. That's his secret value. Trey isn't Dennis' mulligan; he's the last sacrifice to the old order. Dennis is now king!!!!!!
THE END!!!!!!!!
EDIT FOR THE HATERS!!:
I'm not saying that DL knew Trey was a bust and was, therefore, throwing away a top-10 pick in a power grab. A senationalist would read my OP in that way. But I do think he was placating with that pick, which he could afford to do because there weren't any other selections that were screamingly obvious at that spot. So, he lets other interests take the 'win' or the 'loss' on that issue and moves his attention elsewhere (Gobert, Neto). It's obvious why he'd do it this way: he can't lose. If Trey is good, then he has a good asset; if he's bad, then he further cements his influence. How many times did he give Ty credit for Trey?!?!?!
I think this kind of story should resonate with anybody who has been a new guy within an organization... Specifically, a new guy who is supposed to have influence, but who is supposed to step into that influence slowly and purposefully, without 'throwing the baby out with the bathwater' so to speak. My Game Of Thrones reference is playful, but not without value... Those dynamics happen!!!!
EDIT FOR ZULU
Last edited: