You know what? Nobody likes your smart *** remarks. She obviously KNOWS what money is, she just wants to argue. You're a pea-brain *insert super smart-sounding burn here*. Go ahead, sweep THAT under the rug.
The Tea Party Movement
- Thread starter Scat
- Start date
You know what? Nobody likes your smart *** remarks. She obviously KNOWS what money is, she just wants to argue. You're a pea-brain *insert super smart-sounding burn here*. Go ahead, sweep THAT under the rug.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
#with pout via trout:
Don't make fun of my wifey and my mommy; you're soooo not cool to women. Oh, and here's a burn wherein I insinuate that you are an idiot and a woman. done.
Some people I strongly disagree with present knowledge, evidence, willingness to exchange ideas, and understanding that merits a "great proof", and in those discussions I happily do detailed research and present full arguments. Some posters present knowledge, bluster, the need to project their ideas without exhange, and misunderstanding that merely merits a note on the complete wrongheadedness of what they are saying, and in those discussions I am happy to provide the note.
Because if you ask any of the long-timers on this board, the one thing they'll all agree on is that I never produce multiple paragraphs on topics like economics, statistics, biology, politics, or anything else. Also, to be perfectly frank, you have never displayed sufficient knowledge, intelligence, nor comprehension to make an authoritative comment on what is nonsense, economically, and what is not; I find your opinion to be about on the level of a Rush Limbaugh. When you formulate a respectable economic argument, you'll get a respectable argument in return.
That you think you know the opinions of the "entire profession" of economists is highly amusing.
TheMulletMutilator
Member
Then there is you. Someone who enjoys insulting people rather than a civil discussion. For this you are going on my ignore. Bye bye.
I'm no economist, nor do I play one on tv. With that said, anybody who thinks that we are in a good place or headed in the right direction (economically that is) needs to have their head examined. There is enough blame to go around to both parties. As for the original topic of the thread, I can actually understand where the Tea Party is coming from. I wish the government was held to some sort of accountability when it comes to spending my money.
NAOS
Well-Known Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting
And while we are on the topic, go back and check the voting record of people aged (approximately) between 70 and 45. Awesome vision, dudes!
Because you don't know what you're talking about and can't tread water with big boys.
This is like Elmer Fudd giving vocabulary lessons. You wouldn't know a display of sufficient economic knowledge if is slapped you up the backside of the head. But blabber on hillbilly.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
From everything I've been hearing and reading, looks like we're going to have a double dip, eh?
in and of itself, this comment is amusing
Whe you call someone a "lefty fundamentalist", as franklin referred to me, the discussion is not intended to be civil. I felt no need to elevate it in my response to franklin. By contrast, I did not insult you, I merely commented on the ideas you presented.
However, I have no problem with or objection to being on your ignore list. Que sera sera.
Why, that must be it. Unless my answer was sardonic, and I am in fact known for producing paragraphs and pages of detailed responses, but you just too ignorant of the board history to realize that.
Looks like poor little franklin got his feelings hurt again. Still you may well be right that, if teh task were to distinguish genuine economic theory from well-constructed nonsense, I mightlack the background to successfully make the distinct. Fortunately, to properly place your level of economic knowledge, I only need to be able to identify certain kinds of incredibly inept displays of knowledge, the type of which you continually prattle off. Much like in chess, I can't always identify the error made the loser in a World championship game, but I know moving the queen on the third move of a Queens Gambit Declined identifies a patzer.
Last edited:
TheMulletMutilator
Member
These remarks I assume were your way of being cordial. Typical leftist. When you have nothing else you result to smearing. I would put you on ignore but I am not familiar enough with the forum to find it. Either way I am done with you and your cheerleading.
No, they were not cordial. "Cordial" and "civil" are not the same thing. My response to you was civil, but it was not cordial. My response to franklin was not even civil, but as I said, it was merely responding in kind.
I choose to respond as I see the befitting the post to which I am replying. I prefer not to characterize quickly, but when a characterization is appropriate, I am not shy to use it. Even then, you seem to be getting upset over my response to franklin. I will again point out that I did not insult you, as you have not descended to that level.
Click on "Settings" on the top of the page, then look on the left hand side under "My Account". You'll see an entry for "Edit Ignore List". You'll probably need to add the space in my name for it to work.