What's new

The Ultra-Early Best Damn Republican Nominee Political Poll Ever

Which Republican Candidate Would You Prefer to Be Elected President of the United States

  • Michelle Bachmann (and I lean Conservative)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Michelle Bachmann (and I lean Liberal)

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Ron Paul (and I lean Conservative)

    Votes: 4 23.5%
  • Ron Paul (and I lean Liberal)

    Votes: 10 58.8%
  • Tim Pawlenty (and I lean Conservative)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tim Pawlenty (and I lean Liberal)

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Rick Santorum (and I lean Conservative)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Rick Santorum (and I lean Liberal)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Herman Cain (and I lean Conservative)

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Herman Cain (and I lean Liberal)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    17
I wouldn't vote for any of those candidates under any circumstance.

Ron Paul is probably the least cynical of the bunch so I find him the least objectionable but this is basically like making me pick my favorite Laker.
 
Isn't it funny how a couple of these guys that are the furthest thing away from being Ron Paul (Ginrich and Perry) are sounding a lot like him now? I wonder if they might be running for that exact reason....hmmmmmm. The establishment's Ron Paul. You know, not really like him, but just like him until they become president and then they do the normal president thing.

I'll make a prediction, if those two, which Ginrich seems like a flop already hence the need to roll out Perry at this point, aren't able to steal Paul's thunder, Mr. Trump will come rolling in as either an Independent(later) or Republican(sooner) to do exactly that.
 
I wouldn't vote for any of those candidates under any circumstance.

Ron Paul is probably the least cynical of the bunch so I find him the least objectionable but this is basically like making me pick my favorite Laker.

Who would you prefer?
 
He's staunchly conservative, as opposed to Romney who is going to have to explain away his healthcare bill in Mass. He's got a record that includes growing jobs in Texas while other states were losing jobs, and he certainly looks the part. He's also a man, and to this point he's untested. He's pretty much skated through the past few months unscathed while other candidates have been taking beatings.

The problem with perry is that the jobs he's created are usually well below livable wages (think fast-food jobs) or by allowing companies to operate with very few regulations in either pollution or safety, therefore you have dangerous companies moving out of other states, and into Texas so they can practice sub standard business.

He has a ton of momentum though, and he's a super-Christian, so he'll appeal to the very far right.

He's going to be a force to be reckoned with.
 
He's staunchly conservative, as opposed to Romney who is going to have to explain away his healthcare bill in Mass. He's got a record that includes growing jobs in Texas while other states were losing jobs, and he certainly looks the part. He's also a man, and to this point he's untested. He's pretty much skated through the past few months unscathed while other candidates have been taking beatings.

The problem with perry is that the jobs he's created are usually well below livable wages (think fast-food jobs) or by allowing companies to operate with very few regulations in either pollution or safety, therefore you have dangerous companies moving out of other states, and into Texas so they can practice sub standard business.

He has a ton of momentum though, and he's a super-Christian, so he'll appeal to the very far right.

He's going to be a force to be reckoned with.

So.... more Bush then Reagan???
 
He's super-bush, down to the Texas governorship and certain mannerisms.

Having never liked Bush (either of them), is this really something that will appeal to the majority of voters, even Republican voters?
 
It will be very difficult for Perry to bring the "success" he had in Texas to the rest of the country.

The big thing is Texas did not get hurt that much by the housing collapse in 2008. Land is cheap in Texas and there was no huge spike in housing prices because there is such a large surplus of land to build on.

Another thing is unless they strike oil in Michigan or Nevada or much of the Southeast, the rest of the country won't be able to take advantage of the high oil prices that Texas has been able to for the last 8 or 9 years.

And as mentioned before, his claim of job creation success is suspect. A large chunk of those jobs pay minimum wage or less and have no health insurance (Texas leads the country in uninsured children).
 
He's super-bush, down to the Texas governorship and certain mannerisms.

Then he doesn't stand a chance.

Besides, would this country stand another term of Bush policies? We're barely surviving after nearly 12 years.
 
Back
Top