What's new

The Walking Dead

at wat range. most headshots i saw where at close range. 2-5 meters.
i know you can put those automics on semi-auto, or the 3 shot burst. but you gotta remeber in stressfull situation you might get carried away and get panicy. remeber these guys arent really trained. so a handgun would be far better.

Have you ever watched a person shoot a handgun for the first time? 3-5 meters and a lot of people are hard pressed to hit a 8"x11" target.

There are two ways in which handguns are superior to long guns. They are lighter and more portable/stowable/concealable (can be worn in a holster). They provide for better manuverability in tight spaces. Other than that every last thing about a long gun is better. Higer (much higher) powered, higher accuracy rounds. Much easier to aim and hit your target when your front and rear sights are father apart. Much easier to keep the gun stable by pulling it into your shoulder and resting the foregrip on your palm or even better rest the foregrip on a stationary object or use a bipod.

Saying a Glock is better for accuracy makes you sound like a 17 COD master who has never fired a real gun.

And if we're talking accuracy in a pistol I'd probably shoot a browning buckmark .22 or a Ruger MKII in .22. If I wanted a bigger round I'd go with a 1911 or if I could find one an FN Five-seveN. Glock would be down the list a bit...a good bit.
 
guys,,please,,dont make me start it..this is my expert area

this is glock 19 on my belt,,its good,cause its light,,,but not the best,,u ask me best handguns in the market are Sig and makarov(7.65)

XULXn


best rifle,,no doubt ak-47,,than comes ak-74..this one is custom made(chek-fabric) full metal body

Ugo9d


yea,,i know i look stupid
 
Have you ever watched a person shoot a handgun for the first time? 3-5 meters and a lot of people are hard pressed to hit a 8"x11" target.

There are two ways in which handguns are superior to long guns. They are lighter and more portable/stowable/concealable (can be worn in a holster). They provide for better manuverability in tight spaces. Other than that every last thing about a long gun is better. Higer (much higher) powered, higher accuracy rounds. Much easier to aim and hit your target when your front and rear sights are father apart. Much easier to keep the gun stable by pulling it into your shoulder and resting the foregrip on your palm or even better rest the foregrip on a stationary object or use a bipod.

Saying a Glock is better for accuracy makes you sound like a 17 COD master who has never fired a real gun.

And if we're talking accuracy in a pistol I'd probably shoot a browning buckmark .22 or a Ruger MKII in .22. If I wanted a bigger round I'd go with a 1911 or if I could find one an FN Five-seveN. Glock would be down the list a bit...a good bit.

Pistols also seem to be less prone to wasted bullets. I would just prefer the mobility and ability to conceal. Pistol bullets also seem like they would be easier to come by. It's not every Gun Shop that carries AK-47 rounds (right?).
 
Pistols also seem to be less prone to wasted bullets. I would just prefer the mobility and ability to conceal. Pistol bullets also seem like they would be easier to come by. It's not every Gun Shop that carries AK-47 rounds (right?).


It's a pretty popular round and a VERY popular gun (as far as how many exist). Thank communism. They couldn't make enough toilet paper to go around and had a hard time feeding everybody, but they had AKs by the boat-load because AKs were a great bargaining chip when dealing with warloards and revolutionaries.

I would carry a semi-auto rifle and have a pistol on my hip
 
Back
Top