No clue how you got that conclusionAlso he basically repeated my "Vando 2.0" comments exactly, even mentioning Vando by name. It should now be obvious to everyone that he represents an archtype they want to have in this roster.
No clue how you got that conclusionAlso he basically repeated my "Vando 2.0" comments exactly, even mentioning Vando by name. It should now be obvious to everyone that he represents an archtype they want to have in this roster.
Some good stuff in there.
Hardy talking about integrating John Collins into the frontcourt a lot in that one. Most time he spent on any subject apart from staff introduction. Definitely showing where his mind is at right now.
Also he basically repeated my "Vando 2.0" comments exactly, even mentioning Vando by name. It should now be obvious to everyone that he represents an archtype they want to have in this roster.
Agree. People say Collins will make the Lauri jump. It won't happen. To me, the cost of getting Collins is low, but it is not a steal. Who would have given him a 75 mil/ 3 years contract as a free agent? Actually Collins should be played like Bobby Portis. A key reserve on the bench, high energy guy, offers some sparks in the offense end. At the beginning of the season, Hardy will have to start Collins, but I hope down the road he will have the guts to bench Collins.Wow, that's not what I took from his comments at all. I don't think he wanted Collins, and he is currently struggling to figure out how to use him, except in a similar role as Vando, but the problem is he can't play that role with Kessler on the court, it would have to be with KO.
I didn't get that at all either. He was very complimentary of JC's skillset. I think it's more of you just don't know how things fit until you see it happen.Wow, that's not what I took from his comments at all. I don't think he wanted Collins, and he is currently struggling to figure out how to use him, except in a similar role as Vando, but the problem is he can't play that role with Kessler on the court, it would have to be with KO.
I didn't get that at all either. He was very complimentary of JC's skillset. I think it's more of you just don't know how things fit until you see it happen.
I dont think Hardy is even certain on Walker. Like he said, Walker needs a good camp. For all we know, Lauri/JC/KO could be a better front-court combo than Lauri/KO/Walker.Yeah, not wanting Collins is not correct. I think he isn't sure how he will fit with Lauri and Kessler. I'm probably projecting my feelings on Hardy, because I'm still not sure how that is going to work having so many players that want to get to the rim playing at the same time.
I will be the first to admit that we sometimes hear what we want. I could be guilty of confirmation bias here. I went to listen again though and I still didnt get that sense.Wow, that's not what I took from his comments at all. I don't think he wanted Collins, and he is currently struggling to figure out how to use him, except in a similar role as Vando, but the problem is he can't play that role with Kessler on the court, it would have to be with KO.
I agree and as much as I hate to say it goes for Lauri as well. Will opponents be able to neutralize him to a lesser player in a 7 game series?And I know I got labeled as the "Walker Hater" early on last year, but I still want as many opportunities as possible to see Walker in the playoffs before we may have to max him out.
It could very easily bear out that Lauri/JC is a much better duo to invest in as far as playoff basketball goes.
And the same goes for JCollins too. The guy has never been that good in the playoffs for w/e reason.
Oh, I have almost no doubt on Lauri. He's made for the playoffs IMO. I'm so confident in Lauri I think he is squarely a top 15 guy this year.I agree and as much as I hate to say it goes for Lauri as well. Will opponents be able to neutralize him to a lesser player in a 7 game series?
It is of utmost importance we get to see these guys in the playoffs before we tie up our future financially.
I share most of your optimism but I still think its paramount to get the info how teams try to limit him in a full series.Oh, I have almost no doubt on Lauri. He's made for the playoffs IMO. I'm so confident in Lauri I think he is squarely a top 15 guy this year.
The only reason Lauri would fail IMO is if we put lackluster guards around him, which is kind of what we are currently doing.
Being the explosive seven footer he is Lauri will always have the option of driving to the basket if teams are trying to smother him at the three point line. I also hope that he keeps on developing his turnaround midrange jumper, that thing could be money in the playoffs cause with his size he can shoot it over anybody.I share most of your optimism but I still think its paramount to get the info how teams try to limit him in a full series.
In the playoffs defenses play with more intensity, throw more wrinkles at you and tailor stuff to a much greater extent.
Being the explosive seven footer he is Lauri will always have the option of driving to the basket if teams are trying to smother him at the three point line.
Yup. Agreed. Every modern NBA team needs a lot of spacing. If Collins isn't finding his shooting stroke again then they'll probably bench him and start Olynyk instead, just like last season.For that, we need spacing from other frount court players. Both Walker and Collins want to live in the middle.
Developing his midrange arsenal would help a lot. I dont know what his FG% on fadeaways is but in turnarounds I feel its on the low side. Could be wrong though, but at least the latter is not a reliable go-to option for him as he doesnt use it that often.Being the explosive seven footer he is Lauri will always have the option of driving to the basket if teams are trying to smother him at the three point line. I also hope that he keeps on developing his turnaround midrange jumper, that thing could be money in the playoffs cause with his size he can shoot it over anybody.
Developing his midrange arsenal would help a lot. I dont know what his FG% on fadeaways is but in turnarounds I feel its on the low side. Could be wrong though, but at least the latter is not a reliable go-to option for him as he doesnt use it that often.
I agree. Its just something thats good to have in your bag in late clock moments when the defense isnt giving anyone easier looks.I think Lauri's just playing the percentages. And obviously he's doing it extremely well, since this approach has made him one of the most efficient volume scorers in the entire league. His current level is a max player, no ifs or buts.
Lauri almost never takes bad shots or forces things. Sure you'd sometimes like to see him try the types of shots that he's more or less deleted from his regular menu (midrangers, fadeaways, etc), but on the other hand... you can't argue with results.
As I've said before, extremely efficient volume scoring is the holy grail of the NBA.