Thread for responding to lies spread by JazzyFresh

[One Brow]

Says a lot about who you affiliate yourself with. I don't hang around with racist people so that's why I've never heard it used in racism like you.

You may not have heard this particular phrase, but unless you're deaf and blind, you've been hearing racist phrases and seeing racist images all your life. If you don't see that, it's more likely because you have bought into the racism than than any other explanation.

It's always been my theory that people like you, red, Thriller, naos all have white guilt because subconsciously you know your bloodline was guilty of slavery.

What is the history of the slave trade in my bloodline? How far back to you have to go to find slave-owners?

I mean, I saw teachers treat me differently than my fellow students. I've seen police respond to my friends differently than me. I see people on the train treat people differently based on skin regularly. Why would I need to go into my deep past, when it is all around me?

Me... I know mine helped and fought evil so I have no shame or feel no responsibility for what Democrats did.

Good. Instead, feel shame for what happened in the 1920s and onward, when the government acted to drain wealth from black communities into white communities. feel shame for the way you are treated better every day in 2020.

That's why I say, "it's in the blood". So please don't confuse my saying for what your friends in hoods say.

Believe me, my friends in hoodies don't sound anything like you.

 

[Beer]

What in it convicts her? The only person who says she was moving money is Glover, talking to the mother of his child, saying Taylor had the money in her apartment but the police did say anything about finding it. However, there is a later conversation with an unidentified woman, and she confirms she still has Glover's money. Meanwhile, Glover goes out of his way to point out all of Taylor's possessions (car, etc.) were purchased legitimately. When Glover goes into the drug house, Taylor stays in the car. She doesn't seem to use.



There is an A. Walker (one of Glover's fellow dealers) and K. Walker (Taylor's girlfriend). Glover only mentions K. Walker as Taylor's new guy.



One of the details I did not see in the document was that the police asked the USPS to monitor deliveries to Taylor, and they said there was nothing suspicious.

No where in the document does Taylor use drugs, unless I missed something. She dated a dealer and loved a dealer, but that doesn't make her a dealer.

You don't have to be convicted for a search warrant to be legitimate. So not sure what your argument is there. In the first call in that report the caller tells her to go pickup the money that is owed him and she says she will or will try to find the guy. Right? Or did I read it wrong?

So her BF was also a drug dealer but was not the drug dealer they were originally looking for? Keeping all the characters straight was tough.

I don't think whether she uses drugs or not is very relevant to the possibility of her being involved in dealing. If she was an EMT or EMT in training she would probably need to be passing drug tests. But not sure why the media is latching onto her job as a reason she couldn't possibly be involved.

But after trying to read most of that doc it seems like the cops did have fair reason to suspect her or her house were involved in moving drugs. And her BF shot at the cops first. So I just really really don't see how the cops would or should face criminal charges. Wrong place, wrong time for her. Very sad. But from going over that it seems like there is just a very small likelihood she was a completely innocent bystander.

Also seems like all the dealers thought her BF was a moron for shooting at the cops and getting her killed. Which I tend to agree with. But I don't own guns and am not involved in drug dealing so I don't know how on edge you'd have to be to live that life.

 

[One Brow]

Crazy... You all have just been exposed and you will never own it. Obama's FBI is guilty of everything you tried to pin on Trump. There is no hiding it now. More to come...

Sounds like standard intelligence stuff to me. What part of that do you think is corrupt?

You'd think Mueller would've caught that obviousness.

Why would Mueller find it significant.

You guys will completely skip over my post above but we now know(well I've known but the dumb sheep didn't) that Trump had every right to ask for an investigation into Biden.

Right, absolutely. Reason, not at all.

The Democrats literally impeached Trump over absolutely nothing.

This is a lie.

It's now 100% fact that Biden was making shady deals, accepted money from shady people, and this is why you all love him so much gave money to a supposed sex trafficking ring.

Except, we don't know that, and the indications are that there was no illegal activity.

There is now no questions that the Bidens were guilty of multiple criminal violations not only in Ukraine but China and Russia as well.

There is also no evidence that could lead to a criminal conviction.

True or false

It is true that the question has been answered, but not in the way you think.

The investigation found that Hunter Biden had “cashed in” on his father’s name to close lucrative business deals around the world.

Yes, people routinely cash in on their name and connections.

It also concluded that his work for Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company then mired in a corruption scandal, while the former vice president was directing American policy toward Kyiv had given the appearance of a conflict of interest and alarmed some State Department officials.

That seems reasonable.

He is a Democrat. The party calling a netflix series where an 11 year old girl is in the reverse spider position groping her vagina a masterpiece.

I'm not surprised to find you opposed to documentaries that oppose that sexualization of pre-teen girls. That's a very Trumpian position to take.

 

[JazzyFresh]

I'm not surprised to find you opposed to documentaries that oppose that sexualization of pre-teen girls. That's a very Trumpian position to take.

Explain the point of having an 11 year old girl groping her vagina. I would take a screenshot but a) I never care to see child pornography again b) no way I'm sharing that

 

[One Brow]

You don't have to be convicted for a search warrant to be legitimate. So not sure what your argument is there. In the first call in that report the caller tells her to go pickup the money that is owed him and she says she will or will try to find the guy. Right? Or did I read it wrong?

I agree. Doesn't mean she involved herself with the drugs.

So her BF was also a drug dealer but was not the drug dealer they were originally looking for? Keeping all the characters straight was tough.

Her ex-boyfriend (Glover), along with A. Walker, were the targets. K. Walker was not invovled in the investigation until the night Taylor died.

I don't think whether she uses drugs or not is very relevant to the possibility of her being involved in dealing. If she was an EMT or EMT in training she would probably need to be passing drug tests. But not sure why the media is latching onto her job as a reason she couldn't possibly be involved.

I agree her job is not a reason to say that. Every observation of her has her not participating in the drug trade.

But after trying to read most of that doc it seems like the cops did have fair reason to suspect her or her house were involved in moving drugs. And her BF shot at the cops first. So I just really really don't see how the cops would or should face criminal charges. Wrong place, wrong time for her. Very sad. But from going over that it seems like there is just a very small likelihood she was a completely innocent bystander.

I've agree before that the cops (outside of possibly failing to adequately identify themselves) did not break any laws. Frankly, I think the one charge that was levied is more like a scapegoat than anythingelse.

Also seems like all the dealers thought her BF was a moron for shooting at the cops and getting her killed. Which I tend to agree with. But I don't own guns and am not involved in drug dealing so I don't know how on edge you'd have to be to live that life.

Also, the dealers were not aware the the Ken Walker was unaware of the nature of the invaders.

 

[One Brow]

Explain the point of having an 11 year old girl groping her vagina. I would take a screenshot but a) I never care to see child pornography again b) no way I'm sharing that

You don't see that as an example of the extremeness of what they are condemning?

 

[JazzyFresh]

You don't see that as an example of the extremeness of what they are condemning?

I see it as child porn. Go ahead and post the pic here if you think differently. It's in youtube

 

[Beer]

I agree. Doesn't mean she involved herself with the drugs.



Her ex-boyfriend (Glover), along with A. Walker, were the targets. K. Walker was not invovled in the investigation until the night Taylor died.



I agree her job is not a reason to say that. Every observation of her has her not participating in the drug trade.



I've agree before that the cops (outside of possibly failing to adequately identify themselves) did not break any laws. Frankly, I think the one charge that was levied is more like a scapegoat than anythingelse.



Also, the dealers were not aware the the Ken Walker was unaware of the nature of the invaders.

I think we are very close to being on the same page. My only disagreement is I believe that first phone call where she is tasked with running down drug debts makes it pretty likely she was involved to some extent. So not every observation has her not participating. I'm sure she was just trying to help a friend out or what not but you associate yourself with morons and you're going to get caught up in things yourself.

 

[Beer]

I do find it interesting that @The Thriller taps out as soon as the facts don't fit his narrative. Just disappears. Just saying.

 

[Beer]

Also what % of that facts in the Breonna Taylor case do you think Lebron and Donovan know. 10% max is my guess. Probably less though. This is not the hill to die on for them imo.

 

[One Brow]

I think we are very close to being on the same page. My only disagreement is I believe that first phone call where she is tasked with running down drug debts makes it pretty likely she was involved to some extent. So not every observation has her not participating. I'm sure she was just trying to help a friend out or what not but you associate yourself with morons and you're going to get caught up in things yourself.

People in love do stupid things. I don't disagree there.

 

[One Brow]

I see it as child porn. Go ahead and post the pic here if you think differently. It's in youtube

I'm not doing a documentary on the problems of child sexualization. Context matters.