Coincidence that jazzfresh comes back and the fall apart at the same time? I think not
I explained the basic math to every single one of you down to the simplest terms and you all argued I didn't understand exponential growth or how stupid I was for using 2nd grade law of averages. It was common damn sense. Then... You all deny it. You make up post like this claiming something different yet you all argued for literal months with me about it. If what you are saying is true then why did you argue against me for that much time? My ONLY(ONLY) argument was that 75,000,000 were not going to get sick. Nothing less nothing more.If you recall, and you may not, these varying figures were based on models. The model that came up with 75,000,000 was from the Imperial College study, which I posted( remember? You relentlessly, meaning nearly every day, accused me of fear mongering because I posted scientific papers in the coronavirus threads) and which estimated the number of cases based on various models. Whenever you have raged about that particular figure of 75 million, you always leave the modeling out. Part of your dishonest approach to the subject. That high figure was based on the assumption that no efforts at mitigation or containment would take place. In other words, the figure was based on the model that assumed nothing would be done, simply allow the virus to run its course unchecked.
Also, there MAY be an undercount of deaths. Try not to let this go up your arse sideways.
New Study Estimates More Than 900,000 People Have Died Of COVID-19 In U.S.
The total, estimated by researchers at the University of Washington, is 57% higher than the official death toll. Worldwide, they said, COVID-19 deaths are nearing 7 million, twice the official total.www.npr.org
Estimation of total and excess mortality due to COVID-19 | Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Our updated modeling strategy now estimates total COVID-19 mortality, including unreported deaths due to COVID-19.www.healthdata.org
I made up this post? On the contrary, its the same points I used repeatedly to explain it to you in the past. I just explained it again, in the very post you claim is something different than what I told you at the time. No it’s not. I outlined the models the Imperial College study outlined, and their estimates for each. I also not once called you stupid. But you saying I did is just you playing aggrieved victim. Which is your style.
www.deseret.com
I still need an explanation for this "not that I approve of what Biden did". If he wasn't hitting on a 10 year old child what do you disapprove of? You don't approve because you know what he did was flat out wrong. If he was just being nice there would be nothing to disapprove. You're admitting he did something wrong. You're admitting he hit on a little girl.
“experienced pleasure from the failures or shortcomings of others considered trolling to be acceptable online behavior.”Thought this was interesting
The unmistakable characteristics of internet trolls
Are you an internet troll? Here’s how to know.
Lol ouch but I expected you to resort to personal attacks after I was proven right. I even called it back then that you would move the goalpost and lie that you never really said what you did. It's a typical reaction when someone is embarrassed and loses an argument a 2nd grader knew the answer to, as they teach the basic math y'all failed at here at a very young age. It's called self projecting. You claim I'm grieving yet here is 5 full paragraphs of you doing what you accuse me of. Grieving mad that I destroyed you in a very simple argument.
When did he ever get on a little girl? That's sick! He should be in prison if he was climbing on little girls at the press conference or whatever. The sick bastard!
