To be fair he's probably read some of my posts about Trump.Dude made an automatic presumption that folks would dance on the corpse of Limbaugh or Trump "for the lulz", and that's respectful? Really?
Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
To be fair he's probably read some of my posts about Trump.Dude made an automatic presumption that folks would dance on the corpse of Limbaugh or Trump "for the lulz", and that's respectful? Really?
Dude made an automatic presumption that folks would dance on the corpse of Limbaugh or Trump "for the lulz", and that's respectful? Really?
So what's the sweet spot for how many seconds to research this?5 more seconds and you would see it's real.
5 more seconds and you would see it's real.
I think it’s fair to say many would if Trump passed. I’m not sure what you feel he did that was disrespectful?
Carbon V2.5 wasn’t released in 2012.
No but prior versions were, it's retroactive when an update happens. Kind of like how when I change my avatar, my old posts have the new avatar as well.Carbon V2.5 wasn’t released in 2012.
Not 5 seconds it seems.So what's the sweet spot for how many seconds to research this?
Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
@Wes MantoothActually, the tweet itself is real. The account might be a bot though.
So what's the sweet spot for how many seconds to research this?
Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
Well, if I’m wrong, I apologize. Not sure how we definitively know.
Who gives a ****. I saw the tweet from an article on Yahoo. Posted it and didn't think twice of doing research because I wasn't hell bent on it being true.
Lmfao.
I'd rather be that guy than the guy who tries calling out that guy only to fail miserably.
LMFAO
If it’s 100% true, is it really a presumption? I mean, if I say the sun will totally rise tomorrow, is that really a presumption? If it really burns you that badly, swap out Trump for Obama, Limbaugh for “insert CNBC guy here” and then feel better about things. His point is 100% valid regardless.Dude made an automatic presumption that folks would dance on the corpse of Limbaugh or Trump "for the lulz", and that's respectful? Really?
Dude made an automatic presumption that folks would dance on the corpse of Limbaugh or Trump "for the lulz", and that's respectful? Really?
If it’s 100% true, is it really a presumption? I mean, if I say the sun will totally rise tomorrow, is that really a presumption? If it really burns you that badly, swap out Trump for Obama, Limbaugh for “insert CNBC guy here” and then feel better about things. His point is 100% valid regardless.
There is a time and place for everything. The man died, bringing up anything but condolences and sadness at this time is tasteless and shameful.You have low IQ if you think otherwise.
Any polarizing figure will have people, who at first chance, will dance on their corpses.
You're lying to yourself if you think otherwise.
I've grown to like Kobe over the last five years. He's been great after his retirement and is an amazing father. That said, since his passing I've gone back and read the details, evidence and quotes from his sexual allegation. All I have to say is that it's fair people have brought them up. You may not like it, but it is.
@Zombie used the words "torn" (I think - read last night haha) and I think there are Kobe's haters, Kobe's fans, and those who are able to see both his good and his bad.
I certainly will remember him for his good. I've grown to like the guy. However, I'm not going to try and shame someone who brings up his rape after his death. If you wanna be that guy that brushes that under the rug then so be it.