What's new

To the AK haters

Says the guy with a pic of the chick from the mediocre TRON: Legacy.

Quite the insult, coming from a guy who has managed 6,000 posts in just over a year.

Irony's a bitch.

But if you want an in-depth discussion on mise en scene, tableau, slanted angles, design-as-statement, pre and post-Gibson cyberpunk or modern expressionism, well, be sure to learn something about them before you say anything more.

6,000? Christ, it's almost Biblical. Or even Talmudic.
 
Quite the insult, coming from a guy who has managed 6,000 posts in just over a year.

Irony's a bitch.

But if you want an in-depth discussion on mise en scene, tableau, slanted angles, design-as-statement, pre and post-Gibson cyberpunk or modern expressionism, well, be sure to learn something about them before you say anything more.

6,000? Christ, it's almost Biblical. Or even Talmudic.

This doesn't change the fact that TRON: Legacy was mediocre or that you're a pretentious doucher. Are we really gonna split hairs here dude?
 
Quite the insult, coming from a guy who has managed 6,000 posts in just over a year.

Irony's a bitch.

But if you want an in-depth discussion on mise en scene, tableau, slanted angles, design-as-statement, pre and post-Gibson cyberpunk or modern expressionism, well, be sure to learn something about them before you say anything more.

6,000? Christ, it's almost Biblical. Or even Talmudic.

I love it when somebody with some knowledge about what artists have accomplished feels he/she has license to be a prick.

By the way, this movie could have skillfully executed all of these techniques you mention and still been mediocre -- just like your nominalist analyses which hit on some sexy concepts as they fall prey to them.
 
Last edited:
One of my biggest beefs with the pro-ak crowd are threads like these.

"To the AK haters"

These folks make it sound like everyone that doesn't worship ak's dumps hate him because he's Jewish, poor, or black. They act as if all these people who have questions about AK just want to put golden stars on him and put him in a gas chamber.

they just "hate" AK for no reason.

they seem to forget that AK had years and years and years to prove himself. He had years to get a jump shot, develop one single effective offensive move, or become a defensive stopper. He did none of these.

His monstrous contract aside (which is another reason why everyone should be put off by AK), his game just isn't that good. He's a good athlete playing basketball. Not a basketball player with good athleticism.

Even Shawn Marion has developed a pretty good 3 point shot. And instead of crying in the playoffs, he proceeded to frustrate Lebron in winning a championship.

But that's ok. AK has done nothing wrong. He's been a perfect player and jazz fans just hate him because.... Well just because!
 
Quite the insult, coming from a guy who has managed 6,000 posts in just over a year.

Irony's a bitch.

But if you want an in-depth discussion on mise en scene, tableau, slanted angles, design-as-statement, pre and post-Gibson cyberpunk or modern expressionism, well, be sure to learn something about them before you say anything more.

6,000? Christ, it's almost Biblical. Or even Talmudic.

Oh yeah, and it's been 19 months, more than a year and a half. Not just over a year.
 
Kind of a slow sunday for me.
 
That's why? Who did we pass up who would've gotten us to the next level? Last time I checked, Paul, like Williams, has no rings.
Along with less wins head to head (dominated), less playoff wins, fewer playoff advances, and less wins any way you cut it.

He also actually ran a coach out of town.
 
Back
Top