See I didn't even know they could jump high. I thought the knock on both of them was they were both 3/4 tweeners. Sorry to derail the thread, I'll go check out the draft thread.
Tweener is overused word IMO.
Still don't consider Williams a tweener, just think he has been misused his entire career as a SF. He has enough size to be a PF. 6'9 with a 9' standing reach. His main problems where that he wasn't a very good defender, and developed a bad shot selection in attempt to be a SF w/ the Wolves.
Gordon is a very good defender, has a good frame (yes, he is skinny right now, but he has a frame that can add strength), is extremely athletic, wants to defend, has a great handle, has great intangibles, etc. He pretty much has everything besides shooting and sub-par offensive touch.
His biggest concern is his horrendous FT shooting, but his form doesn't appear to be broken (like a MKG or Brewer). He actually shoot 3's though (not a lot, but will take them in rhythm if he is open) and he does hit them (32% on 1 attempt per game). He also doesn't finish as well as you would think around the rim.
He has gotten better as of late though. His last 6 games he has been averaging 15 points per game, and that is with an outlier performance of 3 points vs. Utah. If he could ever develop a jump shot that would approach a Marvin-level, he would be great because of his ability to defend the post and perimeter.