What's new

Tough Day To Be In Law Enforcement

So, going back to the question I actually asked you. Do you really believe that this differential policing suddenly stops when it coming to pulling out weapons or firing weapons?

It wasn't a fair question to ask/put words into my mouth. Youre trying to turn your claim that police don't shoot white people into me saying there is no racial disparity in policing.
 
FYI and FWIW, zombie said he supports ANTIFA violence against those who disagree with their stances. I don't know why you care what he thinks of you.
I disagree with lots of people on here but like to think I'd like anyone if I met them.

That said, there's some liberal dudes that go out of their way to try and tell me something I'm not. I can't imagine being that big of a ***** stain to try and tell someone they're affiliated with a group based off of a few opinions (while ignoring others.)

@Zombie thinks I made the unforgivable sin of sharing Ian's post because in his SIMP's mind I should know who he is, because he does his due diligence and follows these ****s, so should I so therefore, I'm alt right.

Gawd damn it.


The left, eating the left.

Radicals.
 
The whole Portland thing is a mess on so many levels. You have the Antifa rioting and the Trump supporters getting off on trying to Mr. Restore Order and shooting people with paintball guns, mace and beating the **** out of the lil sobs.

He's certainly not the first antifa member to shoot someone. I can think of plenty off the top of my head including one in Utah. That said, looks like he was sprayed with mace first and if that’s the case, just like the Kenosha shooter, according to the law, will probably get off.

I hate guns.

@Zombie better be quick to condemn me far right cause I shared a twitter post by some random Asian guy who you think is "far right.' You can apparently only forgive one "offense" lmao, Mr. RADICAL left Fascist.
Has evidence emerged that the person in Provo was antifa?

Is antifa even an identifiable affiliation or is that just some boogeyman label that gets attached to "certain types?"
 
The whole Portland thing is a mess on so many levels. You have the Antifa rioting and the Trump supporters getting off on trying to Mr. Restore Order and shooting people with paintball guns, mace and beating the **** out of the lil sobs.

He's certainly not the first antifa member to shoot someone. I can think of plenty off the top of my head including one in Utah. That said, looks like he was sprayed with mace first and if that’s the case, just like the Kenosha shooter, according to the law, will probably get off.

I hate guns.

@Zombie better be quick to condemn me far right cause I shared a twitter post by some random Asian guy who you think is "far right.' You can apparently only forgive one "offense" lmao, Mr. RADICAL left Fascist.

Hey, I didn’t have to post that info on killings by the far right vs. by Antifa. I’ve no reason to go up your butt sideways. I’ve made the point in the past that the Far Right has been the more significant threat in the US, for awhile now, I don’t have to beat a dead horse every time you, or anyone else, rages on Antifa. You’re a good man, Archie, that’s all that matters...
 
It wasn't a fair question to ask/put words into my mouth. Youre trying to turn your claim that police don't shoot white people into me saying there is no racial disparity in policing.

I apologize for asking the question so clumsily. I'm pretty sure we both believe there is differential policing at most levels of contact, and I never intended to imply otherwise.

I am only asking about whether you believe differential policing is true at all levels of contact before the police draw weapons and/or fire weapons, but that this effect loses potency when it comes to actually drawing weapons or firing weapons. That's what I understand to be the position that you are arguing.

Personally, I find that unlikely. If police see black people, particularly black men, as a larger threat and need more force used when they are searching, arresting, or restraining people, I don't see those biases disappearing suddenly when they draw/fire guns.
 
Is antifa even an identifiable affiliation or is that just some boogeyman label that gets attached to "certain types?"

At the very least, it's self-identifying. Some people who have destroyed property have claimed to be antifa. I don't know if that applies to the Provo shooter.

Others might not identify as antifa specifically, but protest and makes plans for protesting with those who do. I don't have a problem with labeling those people as antifa, or at least, antifa-adjacent.
 
Has evidence emerged that the person in Provo was antifa?

Is antifa even an identifiable affiliation or is that just some boogeyman label that gets attached to "certain types?"
This would be the first time lethal force was used by a self identified Antifa supporter. I don’t believe there is any umbrella organization know as Antifa....

Edit: sorry, just noticed you mentioned Provo, Utah. I had assumed you were talking about the Portland shooting. As Archie mentioned, maybe self identified Antifa sympathizers have been involved in shootings. I don’t know one way or the other. The Portland shooting would be the first fatal shooting by a self identified Antifa sympathizer.

 
Last edited:
Lol at Archie "I'm not alt right" Moses coming in hot with a Ian Cheong tweet. C'mon man.

This video looks like the shooter may have been acting in self defense.



I’m glad that others are seeing him for what he is. People are becoming wise to his schtick. Has he ever erred in posting a doctored clip in support of BLM? It’s funny that in ever one of these type of threads, he’s one of the only posters who’ll consistently post completely biased and doctored videos attacking BLM. Videos of “journalists” who I’ve never even heard of and whose bias is pretty obvious even in the video. A simple google search reveals how awful the “journalists” are and usually there are a number of well-known and credible sources who’ve refuted the nonsense.

Once another poster sets him straight, he’ll admit that the video was biased but still claim that “both sides” are equally at fault for whatever the original incident was. And then he’ll claim that he’s merely “wanting to find the truth.” Yet, he’ll never post anything in support of BLM. Gee, I wonder why?

And this same cycle repeats every few weeks.

My favorite tactic of his is when he “just asks questions.” Similar to Tucker Carlson, he doesn’t want to admit that he’s alt right. So he’ll “just ask questions” like, “I’m not a racist, but don’t you think that ANTIFA and BLM are controlled by a bunch of shadowy Jewish bankers who want to bring socialism to America? I’m not a racist but is it the craziest idea that Globalist commies are using African Americans to push socialism? I’m not a racist, but did you see how dumb AOC looked here? I don’t have anything against blacks but can we really blame the cop here? The black had dreadlocks and sleeping in a drive thru is so annoying, hey look now the blacks have burned down the fast food restaurant see how dumb the Blacks are? I’m not alt right! I’m definitely not alt right! Check our ben Shapiro, he’s so thought provoking!”

It’s just funny to see this repeat over and over and over again. And now he’ll never let you forget it.
 
Back
Top