Trade deadline discussion

[LoPo]

That wasn't what I was referring to.

I apologize if I referenced the wrong thing. Please tell me what you referring to. Lots of chatter all over the place right now.

 

[LogGrad98]

LoPo is arguing that Nickelback is better than The Cure.

Eh, I never cared for either of them.

 

[infection]

@Handlogten's Heros posted a pod summary that set off a powder keg.

 

[Elizah Huge]

If we are forced to trade one we need to trade Mitchell solely on the fact of trade value.

 

[LoPo]

If we are forced to trade one we need to trade Mitchell solely on the fact of trade value.

If we are forced to trade one, let the locker room decide because they are going to be the ones left with the side that is chosen.

 

[Elizah Huge]

If we are forced to trade one, let the locker room decide because they are going to be the ones left with the side that is chosen.

Let’s not. Why would we trade Gobert for 75 cents on the dollar and be one of the worst defensive teams in the league when we can get $1.25 on the dollar for Mitchell - compete now and get picks/young players for the future.

 

[LoPo]

Let’s not. Why would we trade Gobert for 75 cents on the dollar and be one of the worst defensive teams in the league when we can get $1.25 on the dollar for Mitchell - compete now and get picks/young players for the future.

Because we have an old team, and if they are upset that Donovan is traded, that might lead to future issues down the road.

Just look at what Clarkson said about Rudy's public comments. Y'all are acting like Donovan is the only one irritated by Rudy.

And why would we get .75 on the dollar for Rudy? If anything, this might be the last window of time that we can get great value for Rudy.

 

[Elizah Huge]

We’d have plenty of offers on the table for both but here is the type of deals they’d look like:

Gobert for Barnes/Bagley/1st

Mitchell/Clarkson for Randle/Barrett/Toppin/2 firsts

Which team has a better shot at competing now and is better set up for the future:

Team 1

PG - Conley
SG - Barrett
SF - Bogdanovic
PF - Randle
C - Gobert

6th/7th man - Royce/Toppin

Two New York first round picks with a worse roster plus saving 5M in salary then Ingles comes off the books and we have some flexibility and assets again.

Team 2

PG - Conley
SG - Mitchell
SF - Bogdanovic
PF - Barnes
C - Whiteside

6th/7th man Royce/Clarkson

Sacramento 1st with Rudy improving them and Ingles salary coming off the books.

Seems like a no brainer to me.

 

[LoPo]

We’d have plenty of offers on the table for both but here is the type of deals they’d look like:

Gobert for Barnes/Bagley/1st

Mitchell/Clarkson for Randle/Barrett/Toppin/1st

Which team has a better shot at competing now and is better set up for the future:

Team 1

PG - Conley
SG - Barrett
SF - Bogdanovic
PF - Randle
C - Gobert

6th/7th man - Royce/Toppin

New York 1st round pick plus saving 5M in salary then Ingles comes off the books and we have some flexibility and assets again.

Team 2

PG - Conley
SG - Mitchell
SF - Bogdanovic
PF - Barnes
C - Whiteside

6th/7th man Royce/Clarkson

Sacramento 1st and Ingles salary coming off the books.

Seems like a no brainer to me.

I love your passion, but both of those deals are awful.

 

[LoPo]

If we traded Rudy, we would target Jaylen Brown and take Horford's deal.

If we traded Don, we would target Jaylen Brown and take Smart's deal.

Or at least that's what I would do.

 

[Elizah Huge]

I love your passion, but both of those deals are awful.

I didn’t say I’d do them I said that’s what’s gonna be on the table. Not sure what you think we’d get for either. I’d love to see it.

 

[Elizah Huge]

Randle, Barrett, Toppin and 2 firsts for Mitchell is not terrible either lmao. That is the exact type of deal we’d want especially getting rid of Clarkson in the deal as well.