What's new
By:

Trade deadline discussion



I mean... this seems like a future jazzman no?
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Calling my shot now… the Utah Jazz will trade Joe Ingles, a second round pick, and cash considerations to Portland for Satoransky. They will sell us that they want to see what he has left… but it’s all about the 3M difference in salary that saves us 7-8M and everyone lolz me when I suggest the trade was purely money motivated.

“Sato is better than a broken Joe you moron”

“Money had nothing to do with it”

@infection you will be my witness. TIA
Click to expand...

I think this current iteration of the Jazz's front office will do better than bring back Satoransky. At a minimum, they could probably do a deal with OKC, give them a pick for their services, and come away with Kenrich Williams. That seems like it should be the backstop deal for the Jazz.

However, I think Eric Gordon's current contract is a buzzkill in terms of the Jazz being willing to trade for him. Jazz probably like Gordon, but not at $18M. They're not going to go deeper into the tax.
 
So Cam Reddish basically gone from a backup in Hawks to a third string for the Knicks...

If I'm the kids agent i’ll be understandably upset and request a trade before deadline or next summer at the earliest.
 
Ferguson_Mellochill said:
I think this current iteration of the Jazz's front office will do better than bring back Satoransky. At a minimum, they could probably do a deal with OKC, give them a pick for their services, and come away with Kenrich Williams. That seems like it should be the backstop deal for the Jazz.

However, I think Eric Gordon's current contract is a buzzkill in terms of the Jazz being willing to trade for him. Jazz probably like Gordon, but not at $18M. They're not going to go deeper into the tax.
Click to expand...
Sure... we will pull out some magical picks from the overflowing pick jar we have and will give enough to get both 1- a very serviceable wing in a very thirst wing market who also has a bargain contract 2- Get them to eat 10 M in salary because what else they gonna do?

It will cost a first to do that... they shouldn't send any more firsts.

We are headed for a meh trade deadline move.
 
Also swapping Nance for Jingles works. I don't see Pelicans needing Nance given their loaded frontcourt and he's still got two years left on his contract. So give them an expiring in Jingles to help them cut some salaries and Jazz gets a boost in depth and versatility at the four spot.
 
jom2003 said:
Also swapping Nance for Jingles works. I don't see Pelicans needing Nance given their loaded frontcourt and he's still got two years left on his contract. So give them an expiring in Jingles to help them cut some salaries and Jazz gets a boost in depth and versatility at the four spot.
Click to expand...
I don’t think we’re going to take any non-expiring money in Ingles’ spot.
 
infection said:
I don’t think we’re going to take any non-expiring money in Ingles’ spot.
Click to expand...
I mean Jingles is already an expiring so what's the point of trading him at all if they don't want to take any non-expiring money. Teams aren't gonna give you an expiring who can still play for an expiring who's done for the season
 
jom2003 said:
Also swapping Nance for Jingles works. I don't see Pelicans needing Nance given their loaded frontcourt and he's still got two years left on his contract. So give them an expiring in Jingles to help them cut some salaries and Jazz gets a boost in depth and versatility at the four spot.
Click to expand...
Why are they just gifting him to us... they clearly did want him. He has trade value.
 
jom2003 said:
I mean Jingles is already an expiring so what's the point of trading him at all if they don't want to take any non-expiring money. Teams aren't gonna give you an expiring who can still play for an expiring who's done for the season
Click to expand...
Right, which is why we won't be getting someone who's expiring for Joe's contract, unless it's really just a swap of someone they don't need in exchange for whatever asset we give them. It'd be nice to take Nance in that spot, but that ties up another ~$10M next year and I don't think they bite on that. Any move where we're taking back longer salary, we'll be sending out longer salary (i.e. a playable player). Some media guy here was talking about I think maybe Dan Clayton and Ben Dowsett talking about Hayward and asked if people would trade Clarkson and Ingles for him. The Jazz wouldn't do that. We'd have to send out more of the longer-term salaries and if we're taking that big of a deal, it's not Joe's contract that's going out.
 
jom2003 said:
I mean Jingles is already an expiring so what's the point of trading him at all if they don't want to take any non-expiring money. Teams aren't gonna give you an expiring who can still play for an expiring who's done for the season
Click to expand...
We add a second to Jingles for a player that is also expiring that the other team is not going to retain... say the Clips are cool letting RoCo go.

Or we send out Jingles for a smaller expiring deal with a second to save Ryan some money because that is what we will definitely do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top