What's new

Trade Deadline

If the Jazz can't extract an additional asset in a Trey+Pleiss for Lawson deal, it might be better to pass.

I agree there would seemingly have to be something. I think my preference given contract/fit might be Dekker, though I was lukewarm on him in the draft. But that might be the least likely offer from Houston.

Wasn't there something to the rumor that Houston was motivated to make the trade for the sake of possibly allowing another move elsewhere? If it turns out Houston doesn't have this need, then the chances of this trade are very low, I'd suspect.
 
I agree there would seemingly have to be something. I think my preference given contract/fit might be Dekker, though I was lukewarm on him in the draft. But that might be the least likely offer from Houston.

Wasn't there something to the rumor that Houston was motivated to make the trade for the sake of possibly allowing another move elsewhere? If it turns out Houston doesn't have this need, then the chances of this trade are very low, I'd suspect.
Presumably, Houston wants to get under the Luxury Tax threshold. They're only a few mil over right now, are probably ready to punt the season, and have promised to let Lawson become a free agent this summer regardless. Holding onto Lawson and ending up above the Luxury Tax would be a bad outcome.
 
If Houston can just waive Lawson so that it doesn't affect them next year, wouldn't it make more sense for them to trade someone like Brewer, Ariza, Beverley or MacDaniels if their hope is to shed salary and clear cap space?
 
Back
Top