Bawse Dawg
Well-Known Member
Maybe Houston backed out.If the Jazz are trading Trey anyway, they'd almost certainly rather get Lawson than nothing.
Maybe Houston backed out.If the Jazz are trading Trey anyway, they'd almost certainly rather get Lawson than nothing.
I'd guess they'd rather keep Brewer, Ariza and Beverley. Ty's on his way out in the summer. He's the obvious choice if they can find a deal.If Houston can just waive Lawson so that it doesn't affect them next year, wouldn't it make more sense for them to trade someone like Brewer, Ariza, Beverley or MacDaniels if their hope is to shed salary and clear cap space?
Doesn't make sense. Houston has no incentive to keep Lawson. If they can dump him without giving anything else up, they'll do it.Maybe Houston backed out.
They say they aren't going to buy him out. Maybe they don't hate him as much as we were led to believe.Doesn't make sense. Houston has no incentive to keep Lawson. If they can dump him without giving anything else up, they'll do it.
Maybe Houston doesn't want Burke because they don't want his salary, as small as it is.
They say they aren't going to buy him out. Maybe they don't hate him as much as we were led to believe.
People saying that we still are looking for a PG. Looking at Shelvin Mack. Burke must really want out.
I doubt it. I'm thinking maybe Lawson doesn't want to come to Utah.
Evidence points to the contrary.They're paying him a ton to play like **** in a small role. They want out, there is no question.