seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
i think most expect that. hence calling my shot now.Funnily enough I think he’s the most likely to get traded.
i think most expect that. hence calling my shot now.Funnily enough I think he’s the most likely to get traded.
i think most expect that. hence calling my shot now.
what can we get for him? Any ideas who might be willing to send back enough value,given league parity and the play in thing, that getting anything worth moving him has legs anyway?Trading Clarkson now would be a priority to me. At 31 years old this summer, he doesn’t fit our rebuild timeline. And he’s a 6th man type of player in a contender team, and we already have a similar younger guard in Sexton. Plus JC may well be eyeing free agency anyway because of his age - makes sense for him to want to play for a team that has a better chance to win a championship.
I really want Mike mentoring our PG of the future, so value has to be good.what can we get for him? Any ideas who might be willing to send back enough value,given league parity and the play in thing, that getting anything worth moving him has legs anyway?
I am kind of leaning towards, they don't get enough of an offer until right before the deadline, to justify moving him. But there are certainly a few teams that should have shown interest by now.
I would ascribe their opinon in the front office's here, to be one where JC is worth a mid first, provided the Jazz take back a different over 25 vet that is either hurt or not that good anymore and becomes our tank commander.
Shopping Mike should yeild them a couple of smaller contract players otherwise I am not trading him.
Still a weird trade. I guess we'd preserve the asset cuz DFS in under contract and JC is a FA.They are in win now so JC? Sort of like a budget version of Jalen Brunson..
I think more contender level teams might see Beasley as the more win now choice unless they have injuries like the SunsI really want Mike mentoring our PG of the future, so value has to be good.
For JC, it depends on how the supposed contract discussions went (which JC denied he even had).. but if we trade him he is the best win now piece we are willing to give up.
Depends with Mike. If he is healthy finishing the year his expiring contract has value just as an expiring. It might fetch a greater return this summer. I also don't think the offers are all that great tbh. Would not be surprised to see Mike finish his deal out here.Beasley and Vando are two guys that I think are overvalued around the league right now, which makes it good timing to trade them....Vando has a chance to get better, I think Beasley is who he is but I wouldn't mind trading both.
Last chance to move Conley at any semblance of value as well.
Not totally crazy. Our FO been looking for forwards with more offense... so best case is he fits with Lauri and Kessler and he can at least temporarily be the 4 who can defend 3 and worst case is we ship him elsewhere later.Still a weird trade. I guess we'd preserve the asset cuz DFS in under contract and JC is a FA.
Its just a weird one.