What's new
By:

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Bodhi said:
The wild thing is if the coined had flipped the other way on which side in the debate you were taking on Bones Hyland, this would have been the piece you would use most often. “Dude can’t even get along with a vet coach trying to get his #1 seed team a chip”.

It’s to the point where debating anything is your sport, and listening to another pov is never an option. Chefs kiss to you being a microcosm of society as a whole.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it's a valid anti Bones sentiment. I'm not denying that. Just think the talent in a rookie deal is worth Vanderbilt
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Oh I know… my response was somewhat humorous too. None of you would want me to be a GM over DA or JZ.

My Lauri take was not that we should trade him but what type of offer would we get. Part of it was thinking it could be flash on the pan stuff. His shooting had ebbed and flowed in the past. It was a “move for us to consider. I was looking for a godfather offer and would DA turn it down type of thing. I’m a full on believer now as the sample size has grown significantly.

Trading for Russ or Duncan would still be great to do to get the assets… we should still be looking at those opportunities.
Click to expand...
I'm on a different train but thats fine. I personally like that people think differently.. makes the conversation more colorful as long as people dont take it too personally and blow up too easily.
 
Also I doubt Bones is the ideal Vando trade for Utah. But I think it might be a fallback if they don't need to use him in a package for a bigger deal.

If Vando is dealt in a 1:1 style trade though, I'm guessing it's Bones.
 
I can't believe this Bones conversation is continuing. Has there actually been any kind of rumor that the jazz were interested in him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top