What's new

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Andy Larsen did a great article where he put together a model on why the Jazz got absolute garbage value on this trade - you should pull your head out of your *** and read it sometime.

Shut up and stop ****ing crying. You complain and cry about everything.

Sure looks like there was a ton of value to be had around the league huh. You think the Lakers would trade that first for 15 seconds? 20 seconds? The answer is no.
 
Shut up and stop ****ing crying. You complain and cry about everything.

Sure looks like there was a ton of value to be had around the league huh. You think the Lakers would trade that first for 15 seconds? 20 seconds? The answer is no.
The truly hilarious part is that if the Lakers are as awful as projected there's a fantastic chance the Blazers just got 5x the value for GP2 that we got for Conley/Beasley/Vanderbilt.

But don't take my word for it. Even the Utah Jazz subreddit which is a bastion for super optimistic/homerism takes universally hates this trade.
 
Andy Larsen did a great article where he put together a model on why the Jazz got absolute garbage value on this trade - you should pull your head out of your *** and read it sometime.
We needed to tank, didn't you say we'd be better after we traded the veterans? lmao

The Boston media ripped Danny after he traded KG/Pierce to Brooklyn for Wallace and picks those picks later became Tatum / Brown. Have faith.
 
G1Dvm2MRtENGUiMC_HVMmBbT6swauG1JBzSX_EMbEh0.png
 
Andy Larsen did a great article where he put together a model on why the Jazz got absolute garbage value on this trade - you should pull your head out of your *** and read it sometime.
they did get garbage value. but the point wasn't to get value in return. Ainge would admit the value they got back was garbage. the point was to shed salary and tank - he accomplished that. anything they got back was gravy.
 
they did get garbage value. but the point wasn't to get value in return. Ainge would admit the value they got back was garbage. the point was to shed salary and tank - he accomplished that. anything they got back was gravy.
If we were going to tank, we should've started that process in October, not in February when we're at .500 and our absolute best case scenario tanking wise isn't even bottom 5.
 
If we were going to tank, we should've started that process in October, not in February when we're at .500 and our absolute best case scenario tanking wise isn't even bottom 5.
i agree 100% - the worst thing about the trade is that it didn't happen four months ago.

the optimist in me says better late than never. :shrug:
 
Back
Top