I'm agreeing. Beasley should be one of the players they want most along with Vando. Honestly they should want Mike. Say it was Mike/Bogey/Beasley... and they only give a pick and a swap in the deal with us.... They can offer Mike/Malik/1st rp for Kyrie... they re-sign Bogey on top of it. Brooklyn likely won't tear it down so the players and picks are likely preferable to just letting him walk.Sure, but Bird Rights/team option give you the theoretical optionality of either.
Again, what we got and can offer.
ummmm.... no... if that was his ceiling you never trade him. A non-crazy Rodman would be amazing.What is Vando's ceiling? Dennis Rodman?
What is Vando's ceiling? Dennis Rodman?
A source close to Bogdanovic tells the Tribune that he expects to be traded soon.
Lonzo for Mike straight across is a fine gamble as far as I’m concerned.Lonzo underwent surgery again. I doubt he's healthy with regularity before the AS break. Right now they are good but will be relying more on Dragic than you'd like to. They likely can just work around with Zach, Demar, Ayo, AC... but could see them kicking the tires on Mike or JC in season.
How could they get Mike? They dont have the salary to match unless they want to trade Lonzo, which would require the Jazz to give assets up.Lonzo underwent surgery again. I doubt he's healthy with regularity before the AS break. Right now they are good but will be relying more on Dragic than you'd like to. They likely can just work around with Zach, Demar, Ayo, AC... but could see them kicking the tires on Mike or JC in season.
You'd have to the give the Bulls a first, at least.Lonzo for Mike straight across is a fine gamble as far as I’m concerned.
Why would it necessarily require that? At this point, the Bulls should be concerned they’re never really getting the player they signed back but paying out $70 million all the same.How could they get Mike? They dont have the salary to match unless they want to trade Lonzo, which would require the Jazz to give assets up.