What's new
By:

Trade SZN

Knicks are trying to package their shiny new #23 pick from the Jazz with their #8 pick and move up in the draft.

Cavs may move out of #5.
 
whatthe said:
Do a 5 year stretch and waive Ed.
Click to expand...
Its three years... 2x the length of the deal plus 1. Will only save us 1.6M off the cap doe by time you figure the waive and add in the replacement player at the minimum.

We might not have to use #38 or we might be able to slide down and move Ed... like to Porty. Or you might be able to include it in a sign and trade with Ed for Favors. Who will contribute more over the next 3-4 years Favs or #38. We could still roster our 1st round pick and could snag an undrafted guy or two to build up the farm team.

It may not be the best use of the pick and there may be someone I like (come on Tillman!) but I think it is super helpful in filling out the rotation players. Great deal either way.
 
Wonder if the Jazz could pull this off:

38 and Tony Bradley for 41 (Spurs pick).

1. Is it possible under the CBA?
2. Do the Spurs still like Bradley?

If they do, it would seem like a solid deal for them, especially if they have a target they like.

Buys the Jazz a little bit of breathing room and we never have to watch Tony BRadley again.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Its three years... 2x the length of the deal plus 1. Will only save us 1.6M off the cap doe by time you figure the waive and add in the replacement player at the minimum.

We might not have to use #38 or we might be able to slide down and move Ed... like to Porty. Or you might be able to include it in a sign and trade with Ed for Favors. Who will contribute more over the next 3-4 years Favs or #38. We could still roster our 1st round pick and could snag an undrafted guy or two to build up the farm team.

It may not be the best use of the pick and there may be someone I like (come on Tillman!) but I think it is super helpful in filling out the rotation players. Great deal either way.
Click to expand...
Honestly think the better idea is to get off Bradley. Maybe Ed has some kind of resurgence if the primary issue was his health? Bradley also slightly cheaper so would be easier to trade.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Honestly think the better idea is to get off Bradley. Maybe Ed has some kind of resurgence if the primary issue was his health? Bradley also slightly cheaper so would be easier to trade.
Click to expand...
Might be... would probably sign a minimum guy like Len to be sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top