spycam1
Well-Known Member
I don't care if it makes us thinner this year. Every move we make should be about the long term goal: winning a championship. Knight is clearly better than Burks or Hood, so this trade moves us forward in the long run, and that's all that matters IMO.We're already thin and would trade two of our key contributors away for an average point guard after just spending the #5 overall pick on a kid who you just happen to love and who just happens to also play point guard? Doesn't make sense to me. I'd rather have Jrue. He's 4M cheaper and his contract is up after next year and he's currently coming off the bench anyway so if that were to continue next year when Exum returns, it shouldn't ruffle too many feathers. Burke for Jrue would work I think. And it would free up about 8M for the Pels this summer so that they could maybe pursue a legit FA.
Exum-Jrue-Neto
Burks-Hood
Hayward-Lyles
Favors-FA-1st rounder(Bender is my dream)
Gobert-Withey
What say you about that as our core next year?
Part of why I like the idea of Knight is because I believe he and Exum can co-exist. I don't think of Knight as a pure point; he's a combo guard. He can play along side Exum and run the point while Exum sits. He already has shown he can do this with Bledsoe. His outside shooting should compliment Exum's driving ability nicely, and I think they can both switch onto 1s and 2s. It would work on both ends of the floor.
Your core looks good. But Holiday is much riskier than Knight. He's had major injuries and is years older. I'd be good with him at the right price, but obviously would much rather have Knight. Like I said before: Knight's contract is very fair with the rising cap.
In the end, I have no idea what the Jazz will do. None of these trade ideas ever come to fruition anyway. I don't think Lindsay will make a major move. I think he has faith in the core of this team and will just let the development process continue unless an undeniably good trade presents itself.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk