Hotdog
Well-Known Member
So first of all. I thought better of you than posting FG%. Haven't I taught tards like you that you use eFG% when you talk about shooting? #disappointed
So you're really discrediting your credentials right here. I also added that he lost efficiency immediately after the trade because he was playing 1v5 on the Nets. In Utah he had a lot of guys next to him that didn't allow opponents to double him. After the trade everything focused on him defensively.
Now I look at his best years;
And I do it the right, educated way:
D-Will TS% eFG% FTr 3PAr ORtg WS/48
07/08: .595 .544 .368 .188 118 .177
08/09: .573 .506 .390 .230 116 .160
09/10: .574 .515 .397 .246 116 .177
10/11: .587 .513 .439 .320 116 .159 <-at Utah
10/11: .463 .396 .343 .349 103 .066 <-Nets
11/12: .527 .467 .317 .356 106 .099
12/13: .574 .516 .328 .398 118 .184
13/14: .585 .544 .295 .326 111 .110 (injured again)
So how is the 12/13 year where he played 78 regular season games worse than his best days in Utah? Right, it isn't. That's when he had a comparable supporting cast to his Jazz days and didn't get penta teamed on offense while unhappy about being in New Jersey and wanting his way out like Dwight.
Thing is Deron was never a franchise player. He was good when surrounded by talent and that made him look better. He's a sidekick that's it. And injury or not he's still just as good as in Utah. He simply shoots more from deep.
TS% is so important because of why...?
FG% > TS% tbh
TS is just useless bullcrap stat that means nothing and is deceiving. You just proved that for me.
Like I said, I saw it with my own eyes. Ive watched every Jazz game since I can remember. I dont need your ridiculous mathematical formal to tell me what I am seeing. Game recognize game..