What's new
By:

Trey Lyles being held out of practice/Summer League for now

1)So the Jazz were going to bring in 17 million in Salary and send out 3 million?

2)Wouldn't the Jazz need to sign Lyles to have more salary to send out?

3)This trade would never work as proposed. So if there was a deal for PG these weren't the details.
 
♪alt13 said:
1)So the Jazz were going to bring in 17 million in Salary and send out 3 million?

2)Wouldn't the Jazz need to sign Lyles to have more salary to send out?

3)This trade would never work as proposed. So if there was a deal for PG these weren't the details.
Click to expand...

this whole thing has ******** smeared all over it. Top to bottom.
 
NAOS said:
this whole thing has ******** smeared all over it. Top to bottom.
Click to expand...

i don't want offend my favorite (besides one love) and i hope i can't, but i think this can't make sense and was not true. wht is this other peeks? i don't get who this references, but that one is not possible and i see it on nba 2k.
 
I know this is RUSE!!! What is wrong here with this lies and make stories and I can be happy and mad and sad all one day!!!!
 
Nothing can officially happen until the 9th anyway, so there's still time for Indiana to pull out of the Lakers deal
 
♪alt13 said:
1)So the Jazz were going to bring in 17 million in Salary and send out 3 million?

2)Wouldn't the Jazz need to sign Lyles to have more salary to send out?

3)This trade would never work as proposed. So if there was a deal for PG these weren't the details.
Click to expand...

I'm no cap expert, so I could be wrong, nor do I have an opinion one way or the other on whether this rumor has anything behind it (hard to grasp from Knicks' POV), but:

I'm sure Booker would have been included. With Booker (and maybe Chris Johnson) in the trade, I think the numbers work out pretty close to fitting in the Jazz's cap space. If the Jazz are under the cap, it doesn't matter how much or little they send out, does it?
 
If you add Carmelo to our team, we are competing for a title. Melo has only missed the playoffs twice, took a terrible Denver team to the playoffs his first year, and won a national title by carrying his team. Anthony is a very good player and we'd be crazy to not trade for him if he was available.

I don't get why Jazz fans don't like very, very good players. It's unreal. Don't you guys want to win? You need stars to win, most stars are bitches, and stars don't play defense. That's why there are role players. To do the Charlie work.
 
If you add Carmelo to our team, we are competing for a title. Melo has only missed the playoffs twice, took a terrible Denver team to the playoffs his first year, and won a national title by carrying his team. Anthony is a very good player and we'd be crazy to not trade for him if he was available.

I don't get why Jazz fans don't like very, very good players. It's unreal. Don't you guys want to win? You need stars to win, most stars are bitches, and stars don't play defense. That's why there are role players. To do the Charlie work.
 
idiot said:
If the Jazz are under the cap, it doesn't matter how much or little they send out, does it?
Click to expand...

It matters. They can bring back more than they send, but the trade can't result in Utah going over the cap. This is the reason it's an advantage to maintain some cap space leading up to the trade deadline, because it gives more flexibility to make trades work.
 
I love Hoods game, but his health worries me.
He seems to be one of those guys that is perpetually injured. One of the big reasons I thought Booker should have been the pick.

Burks coming off a season long injury, and Rodney who is down again (even if its slight im seeing a pattern forming) do not make me confident they are enough.

I hope this doesnt come back to bite us in the ***.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top