What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

Cenk Uyger is far left of the Democrat party. He's ******** on the center-right, establishment wing of the party and he's saying if the new admin wants actually to go after corruption, and not just for social programs, they should go after the Pentagon first. He's testing their commitment to their rhetoric.

It's the leftists who are committed to getting things done and are ideologically consistent. I.E. Bernie and Cenk willing to get stuff they want done under any Admin if they see a path to do so. I doubt they believe that the republicans will follow through but it's clear they don't mind giving it a shot.
Follow up on your point by Cenk:

View: https://x.com/vigilantfox/status/1859797613278888361?s=46&t=BMMZjW7vq0_zwnmLDjNTgQ
 
I was hoping (again) that I would be wrong about trump and he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Sucks to be right again.
His replacement hire, Pam Bondi, is a nepotism hire. Worked as his lawyer during his first impeachment trial and is a frequent trump rally attendee. Her office also received payments from trumps charity when her office was looking into prosecuting trump for Trump University.

She gained national attention with appearances on Fox News as a defender of Trump and had a notable speaking spot at 2016 Republican National Convention as Trump became the party's surprising nominee. During the remarks, some in the crowd began chanting "Lock her up" about Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
Bondi responded by saying, “‘Lock her up,’ I love that."

She served as a chairwoman of America First Policy Institute, a think tank set up by former Trump administration staffers to lay the groundwork if he won a second term.

She is also a lobbyist. Bondi worked as a lobbyist for Ballard Partners, the powerful Florida-based firm where Trump’s campaign chief and incoming chief of staff Susie Wiles was a partner. Her U.S. clients have included General Motors and the commissioner of Major League Baseball.

She would also be the first AG to be registered as a foreign agent, according to what the KSL radio host said this morning. She lobbied for a Kuwaiti firm, according to Justice Department foreign agent filings and congressional lobbying documents. She registered as a foreign agent for the government of Qatar.

Bondi stepped away from lobbying to serve on Trump’s legal team during his first impeachment trial in 2020. (its still crazy to me that trump blackmailed a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and there were no real consequences for it)

As president, Trump demanded investigations into political opponents like Hillary Clinton and sought to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to advance his own interests, including in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Bondi appears likely to oblige him.

She would inherit a Justice Department expected to pivot sharply on civil rights, corporate enforcement and the prosecutions of hundreds of Trump supporters charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol — defendants whom Trump has pledged to pardon.

Bondi issued a public apology in 2013 while serving as attorney general after she sought to delay the execution of a convicted killer because it conflicted with a fundraiser for her reelection campaign.

Bondi personally solicited a 2013 political contribution from Trump as her office was weighing whether to join New York in suing over fraud allegations involving Trump University.

Trump cut a $25,000 check to a political committee supporting Bondi from his family’s charitable foundation, in violation of legal prohibitions against charities supporting partisan political activities. After the check came in, Bondi’s office nixed suing Trump’s company for fraud, citing insufficient grounds to proceed.

Two days before being sworn in as president in January 2017, Trump paid $25 million to settle three lawsuits alleging Trump University defrauded its students.

Trump also paid a $2,500 fine to the IRS over the illegal political donation to support Bondi from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, which he was forced to dissolve amid an investigation by the state of New York.

Im not saying she isn't experienced and qualified but it would be nice if she was experienced and qualified and also not so obviously compromised and bias.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping (again) that I would be wrong about trump and he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Sucks to be right again.
His replacement hire, Pam Bondi, is a nepotism hire. Worked as his lawyer during his first impeachment trial and is a frequent trump rally attendee. Her office also received payments from trumps charity when her office was looking into prosecuting trump for Trump University.

She gained national attention with appearances on Fox News as a defender of Trump and had a notable speaking spot at 2016 Republican National Convention as Trump became the party's surprising nominee. During the remarks, some in the crowd began chanting "Lock her up" about Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
Bondi responded by saying, “‘Lock her up,’ I love that."

She served as a chairwoman of America First Policy Institute, a think tank set up by former Trump administration staffers to lay the groundwork if he won a second term.

She is also a lobbyist. Bondi worked as a lobbyist for Ballard Partners, the powerful Florida-based firm where Trump’s campaign chief and incoming chief of staff Susie Wiles was a partner. Her U.S. clients have included General Motors and the commissioner of Major League Baseball.

She would also be the first AG to be registered as a foreign agent, according to what the KSL radio host said this morning. She lobbied for a Kuwaiti firm, according to Justice Department foreign agent filings and congressional lobbying documents. She registered as a foreign agent for the government of Qatar.

Bondi stepped away from lobbying to serve on Trump’s legal team during his first impeachment trial in 2020. (its still crazy to me that trump blackmailed a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and there were no real consequences for it)

As president, Trump demanded investigations into political opponents like Hillary Clinton and sought to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to advance his own interests, including in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Bondi appears likely to oblige him.

She would inherit a Justice Department expected to pivot sharply on civil rights, corporate enforcement and the prosecutions of hundreds of Trump supporters charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol — defendants whom Trump has pledged to pardon.

Bondi issued a public apology in 2013 while serving as attorney general after she sought to delay the execution of a convicted killer because it conflicted with a fundraiser for her reelection campaign.

Bondi personally solicited a 2013 political contribution from Trump as her office was weighing whether to join New York in suing over fraud allegations involving Trump University.

Trump cut a $25,000 check to a political committee supporting Bondi from his family’s charitable foundation, in violation of legal prohibitions against charities supporting partisan political activities. After the check came in, Bondi’s office nixed suing Trump’s company for fraud, citing insufficient grounds to proceed.

Two days before being sworn in as president in January 2017, Trump paid $25 million to settle three lawsuits alleging Trump University defrauded its students.

Trump also paid a $2,500 fine to the IRS over the illegal political donation to support Bondi from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, which he was forced to dissolve amid an investigation by the state of New York.
What makes her unqualified or experienced as an attorney?

Just because you don’t like her past doesn’t make her unqualified. You can make this argument for everyone.

Please tell me why Pete Buttigieg was qualified to be the Secretary of Transportation? What in his past made him the best candidate for that position? Sounds like a nepotism hire. Why didn’t Biden reach across the isle and select a republican for that position, you know, one that was qualified.
 
What makes her unqualified or experienced as an attorney?

Just because you don’t like her past doesn’t make her unqualified. You can make this argument for everyone.

Please tell me why Pete Buttigieg was qualified to be the Secretary of Transportation? What in his past made him the best candidate for that position? Sounds like a nepotism hire. Why didn’t Biden reach across the isle and select a republican for that position, you know, one that was qualified.
Wait, where did I say she isn't qualified or experienced? What I actually said is I wished he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Instead of qualified and experienced BUT ALSO corrupt and biased and worked for him and a rally attendee etc.
In fact if you look at the last sentence of my post it says "Im not saying she isn't experienced and qualified but it would be nice if she was experienced and qualified and also not so obviously compromised and bias."
I literally put that sentence in there because I knew the post you made was coming lol.
 
Last edited:
Trump has previously named his other personal attorneys to senior roles in the Department of Justice, including Todd Blanche, Emil Bove and D. John Sauer.
 
I was hoping (again) that I would be wrong about trump and he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Sucks to be right again.
His replacement hire, Pam Bondi, is a nepotism hire. Worked as his lawyer during his first impeachment trial and is a frequent trump rally attendee. Her office also received payments from trumps charity when her office was looking into prosecuting trump for Trump University.

She gained national attention with appearances on Fox News as a defender of Trump and had a notable speaking spot at 2016 Republican National Convention as Trump became the party's surprising nominee. During the remarks, some in the crowd began chanting "Lock her up" about Trump's Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
Bondi responded by saying, “‘Lock her up,’ I love that."

She served as a chairwoman of America First Policy Institute, a think tank set up by former Trump administration staffers to lay the groundwork if he won a second term.

She is also a lobbyist. Bondi worked as a lobbyist for Ballard Partners, the powerful Florida-based firm where Trump’s campaign chief and incoming chief of staff Susie Wiles was a partner. Her U.S. clients have included General Motors and the commissioner of Major League Baseball.

She would also be the first AG to be registered as a foreign agent, according to what the KSL radio host said this morning. She lobbied for a Kuwaiti firm, according to Justice Department foreign agent filings and congressional lobbying documents. She registered as a foreign agent for the government of Qatar.

Bondi stepped away from lobbying to serve on Trump’s legal team during his first impeachment trial in 2020. (its still crazy to me that trump blackmailed a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and there were no real consequences for it)

As president, Trump demanded investigations into political opponents like Hillary Clinton and sought to use the law enforcement powers of the Justice Department to advance his own interests, including in trying to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Bondi appears likely to oblige him.

She would inherit a Justice Department expected to pivot sharply on civil rights, corporate enforcement and the prosecutions of hundreds of Trump supporters charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol — defendants whom Trump has pledged to pardon.

Bondi issued a public apology in 2013 while serving as attorney general after she sought to delay the execution of a convicted killer because it conflicted with a fundraiser for her reelection campaign.

Bondi personally solicited a 2013 political contribution from Trump as her office was weighing whether to join New York in suing over fraud allegations involving Trump University.

Trump cut a $25,000 check to a political committee supporting Bondi from his family’s charitable foundation, in violation of legal prohibitions against charities supporting partisan political activities. After the check came in, Bondi’s office nixed suing Trump’s company for fraud, citing insufficient grounds to proceed.

Two days before being sworn in as president in January 2017, Trump paid $25 million to settle three lawsuits alleging Trump University defrauded its students.

Trump also paid a $2,500 fine to the IRS over the illegal political donation to support Bondi from the Donald J. Trump Foundation, which he was forced to dissolve amid an investigation by the state of New York.

Im not saying she isn't experienced and qualified but it would be nice if she was experienced and qualified and also not so obviously compromised and bias.
Source? You didn’t write this you stole it. Plagiarist liar. Why is it so hard for you to give up this horrible habit of pretending someone’s else’s words are yours?
Fish steals opinions because he’s too dumb to formulate one of his own. He doesn’t care about honesty or ethics.
 
Last edited:
Source? You didn’t write this you stole it. Plagiarist liar. Why is it so hard for you to give up this horrible habit of pretending someone’s else’s words are yours?
Cry baby. You can use google. I figured it would be obvious that not all of this was my words. I mean there are underlined hyperlinks all throughout the post. 6 of them in fact. Click on them and they will take you to sources. I guess for simpletons like yourself it can be confusing. Sucks for you.
 
Cry baby. You can use google. I figured it would be obvious that not all of this was my words. I mean there are underlined hyperlinks all throughout the post. 6 of them in fact. Click on them and they will take you to sources. I guess for simpletons like yourself it can be confusing. Sucks for you.
Hypocrite. I find it ironic that somebody that has being crying about the ethics and honesty of Trump for decades calls me names when I call him out for his dishonesty and lack of ethics. Very trump like behavior fish the hypocrisy is very bluanon of you though.
 
Last edited:
  • Dislike
Reactions: MVP
Wait, where did I say she isn't qualified or experienced?
IMG_5665.jpeg
You implying that she is not qualified or experienced by saying “Sucks to be right again”?
What I actually said is I wished he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Instead of qualified and experienced BUT ALSO corrupt and biased and worked for him and a rally attendee etc.
Again you don’t think she is qualified or experienced because you don’t like her past?

In fact if you look at the last sentence of my post it says "Im not saying she isn't experienced and qualified but it would be nice if she was experienced and qualified and also not so obviously compromised and bias."
I literally put that sentence in there because I knew the post you made was coming lol.
So you say she is not twice, then you say she is experienced? I’m honestly confused…

Why would you just say you think she is corrupt and make that the post, and not the opening paragraph about how right you are about inexperienced and unqualified.

Why is it such a big deal for a few of you in here that Trump can pick who he wants and if they are loyal to him. You just skipped over Pete and his position; you don’t think he is loyal to Biden?
 
Hypocrite. I find it ironic that somebody that has being crying about the ethics and honesty of Trump for decades calls me names when I call him out for his dishonesty and lack of ethics. Very trump like behavior fish the hypocrisy is very bluanon of you though.
There you go. Get it all out. Cry harder
 
View attachment 17628
You implying that she is not qualified or experienced by saying “Sucks to be right again”?

Again you don’t think she is qualified or experienced because you don’t like her past?


So you say she is not twice, then you say she is experienced? I’m honestly confused…

Why would you just say you think she is corrupt and make that the post, and not the opening paragraph about how right you are about inexperienced and unqualified.

Why is it such a big deal for a few of you in here that Trump can pick who he wants and if they are loyal to him. You just skipped over Pete and his position; you don’t think he is loyal to Biden?
Do you really expect fish to thoughtfully defend or expound on an opinion he obviously copied and pasted off the internet with no sources and tried to pass off as his own? lol
 
View attachment 17628
You implying that she is not qualified or experienced by saying “Sucks to be right again”?

Again you don’t think she is qualified or experienced because you don’t like her past?


So you say she is not twice, then you say she is experienced? I’m honestly confused…

Why would you just say you think she is corrupt and make that the post, and not the opening paragraph about how right you are about inexperienced and unqualified.

Why is it such a big deal for a few of you in here that Trump can pick who he wants and if they are loyal to him. You just skipped over Pete and his position; you don’t think he is loyal to Biden?
You are confused by my statement and I see why. I said I wish he would simply (simply being the key word showing that there is more to the pick than being experience and qualified. It's not that simple like I would prefer to be.) pick someone who is qualified and experienced. You take that statement to mean that I am saying he didn't pick someone who is qualified and experienced. I can see how it appears that way.
What that statement meant to say is that I wish he would simply pick someone who is qualified and experienced. Period. Without all the other crap.
Instead of picking someone who is qualified and experienced AND ALSO has all the baggage and bias and appearance of corruption.
I figured my final sentence where I said "Im not saying she isn't experienced and qualified but it would be nice if she was experienced and qualified and also not so obviously compromised and bias" would clear that up.

So now I'm hoping that you finally understand that I was never trying to say that this choice was an unqualified and inexperienced choice and you can move past that and either discuss what I was being critical about or just move on.

As for Pete maybe you have some evidence that he was super loyal to Biden and Biden had paid Pete money when Pete's firm was looking to investigating Biden and then Pete's firm dropped the investigation right after getting the payment. Maybe Pete represented Biden in an impeachment. Maybe Pete went to Biden rallies and is involved in Democrat PACs etc.

So far, I haven't seen you provide any of that info though.

Anywho, if you want to criticize the choice of Pete for that position then I won't begrudge you. Be my guest.
 
Last edited:
Wait, where did I say she isn't qualified or experienced? What I actually said is I wished he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Instead of qualified and experienced BUT ALSO corrupt and biased and worked for him and a rally attendee etc.
In fact if you look at the last sentence of my post it says "Im not saying she isn't experienced and qualified but it would be nice if she was experienced and qualified and also not so obviously compromised and bias."
I literally put that sentence in there because I knew the post you made was coming lol.
He cherry-picked the first sentence of your post and took that as the whole.

I was hoping (again) that I would be wrong about trump and he would simply choose candidates who were qualified and experienced. Sucks to be right again.
 
He cherry-picked the first sentence of your post and took that as the whole.
To be fair I can see why he thought I was saying she isn't qualified or experienced. I worded it poorly. I have explained myself like 3 times now though so hopefully that is enough to make him understand my actual stance on her being qualified and experienced. That was never intended to be the criticism I was making of the choice. The other 90% of my post was the criticism that was being made but unfortunately was not as obvious as I thought it was.
 
You mean the only sentence that fish actually wrote? Haha! The rest of it was copied from I assume some msnbc hack.
That's it. Cry more. You will feel better.
 
To be fair I can see why he thought I was saying she isn't qualified or experienced. I worded it poorly. I have explained myself like 3 times now though so hopefully that is enough to make him understand my actual stance on her being qualified and experienced. That was never intended to be the criticism I was making of the choice. The other 90% of my post was the criticism that was being made but unfortunately was not as obvious as I thought it was.
You clarified just fine in the original post. It is willful misrepresentation.
 
You mean the only sentence that fish actually wrote? Haha! The rest of it was copied from I assume some msnbc hack.
I was almost going to say the same thing. I’m fine with him copying and pasting, I know he adds the links, which I do appreciate.

How I read what he wrote, she wasn’t experienced or qualified and he was proved right. That was his opening paragraph, nothing about corruption or loyalty.


The left is fine being loyal, only if you’re left. Youre not a dictator then. But if someone is loyal to Trump then that is a sign of a Dictator.

Total fake outrage. I’ll wait till Triller or Log is happy with a nomination. I mean they are not even happy with Doge, because it’s going to be run by a scary billionaire. It’s only dictatorship this and authoritarian that, see how we are Nazi 2.0. They complained about how some posters posted the same stuff over and over again and called them trolls. They are now the trolls, which don’t bring any value. They are pissed their Tribe didn’t win, and now they are going to act like Eeyor and complain about every little thing.
 
Back
Top