That wasn't the word in your fantasy I was taking issue with but if you say that walking constitutes insurrection, there was definitely walking involved in the BLM riots.
I never said anything constitutes insurrection silly. i was simply pointing out what trump did and his involvement everything that took place. Seems that judges and lawyers and legal experts are the ones saying what trump did constitutes insurrection. But I didn't. i simply pointed out trumps involvement in what legal experts say was insurrection.
As for the blm riots, i already agreed with you that the person responsible for those riots shouldn't have his name on any ballot. I think that cop is in jail anyways so its kinda moot.
Biden's corruption isn't insurrection but you could easily make the case that Kamala Harris's tweet to "if you're able to, chip in now to help post bail for those protesting" during the BLM riots while rioters were attacking government buildings was involvement in insurrection.
You could but a judge would laugh. I put out a huge list of trumps involvement. If trump made one tweet then he wouldn't be in this situation. Not samesies. If she doesnt make that tweet then the riots still happen. If trump doesn't do what he did then the attack never happens. Trump was/is responsible. Kamala wasn't and isnt. Its incredibly clear to non idiots.
The rule isn't about leading or instigating or responsibility. Simple involvement all that is required for disqualification. Last year this same provision was used to disqualify Otero County, New Mexico, Commissioner Couy Griffin. Maybe this will come as news to you but Couy Griffin isn't the mastermind initiating the riot.
It isn't about 'causing'. It is about 'insurrecting'.
Ya and judges, lawyers, and legal experts agree.
Merry Xmas!
