What's new
By:
Filters

Tucker Carlson’s Rhetoric and White Replacement Theory

Archie Moses said:
I haven't read the whole thread.
Click to expand...
Cool. Now you know it contains the answers you seek, many from direct responses to you. It's up to you to choose to avail yourself of that knowledge, or not.

Educating you would not be pointless, just unnecessarily repetitive, and would diminish the contributions of the posters who already provided the information.
 
One Brow said:
Cool. Now you know it contains the answers you seek, many from direct responses to you. It's up to you to choose to avail yourself of that knowledge, or not.

Educating you would not be pointless, just unnecessarily repetitive, and would diminish the contributions of the posters who already provided the information.
Click to expand...
I don't know why you would expect he would read your response, since he obviously hasn't before.
 
One Brow said:
Cool. Now you know it contains the answers you seek, many from direct responses to you. It's up to you to choose to avail yourself of that knowledge, or not.

Educating you would not be pointless, just unnecessarily repetitive, and would diminish the contributions of the posters who already provided the information.
Click to expand...

So, someone answered my question about a specific video before I asked my question about a specific video?

No, no they didn't. Neither have you.
 
I imagine this is how it feels when people argue with Tucker.
Gameface said:
I have not and have no plans to watch a Tucker Carlson video. I have no idea what he says and no interest in what he says.

So that out of the way I just want to say that I agree with you and I believe you.
Click to expand...
This was my first problem.

Why do I make such dumb decisions?
 
Archie Moses said:
So, someone answered my question about a specific video before I asked my question about a specific video?

No, no they didn't. Neither have you.
Click to expand...
I didn't say "before", I said "in reply to".

The questions you asked, "Going back to the video, what did the Carston guy say that was white supremacy? I'm serious. Educate me." was in post #37.

Red replied to your question in #38 and #39, and you responded in #40 with "I guess, for me, politics get too political." rather than engage in any sort of substantive discussion. The Thriller responded with even more detail, including several links to reputable sources, in #41-43, which were ignored.

As I said, there isn't much left for me to say. Your level of concern seems entirely on the surface to me, but only you can say for sure.
 
Last edited:
The policy platform of the America First Caucus:


And the platform’s opening paragraphs on immigration:

Immigration
The America First Caucus recognizes that our country is more than a mass of consumers or a series of abstract ideas. America is a nation with a border, and a culture, strengthened by a common respect for uniquely Anglo-Saxon political traditions. History has shown that societal trust and political unity are threatened when foreign citizens are imported en-masse into a country, particularly without institutional support for assimilation and an expansive welfare state to bail them out should they fail to contribute positively to the country. While certain economic and financial interest groups benefit immensely from mass immigration, legal as well as illegal, and the aggregate output of the country increases, the reality of large segments of our society as well as the long-term existential future of America as a unique country with a unique culture and a unique identity being put at unnecessary risk is something our leaders can afford to ignore no longer.

As such, America’s legal immigration system should be curtailed to those that can contribute not only economically, but have demonstrated respect for this nation’s culture and rule of law. America’s borders must be defended, and illegal immigration must be stopped without exception.
 
Last edited:
Red said:
The policy platform of the America First Caucus:


And the platform’s opening paragraphs on immigration:

Immigration
The America First Caucus recognizes that our country is more than a mass of consumers or a series of abstract ideas. America is a nation with a border, and a culture, strengthened by a common respect for uniquely Anglo-Saxon political traditions. History has shown that societal trust and political unity are threatened when foreign citizens are imported en-masse into a country, particularly without institutional support for assimilation and an expansive welfare state to bail them out should they fail to contribute positively to the country. While certain economic and financial interest groups benefit immensely from mass immigration, legal as well as illegal, and the aggregate output of the country increases, the reality of large segments of our society as well as the long-term existential future of America as a unique country with a unique culture and a unique identity being put at unnecessary risk is something our leaders can afford to ignore no longer.

As such, America’s legal immigration system should be curtailed to those that can contribute not only economically, but have demonstrated respect for this nation’s culture and rule of law. America’s borders must be defended, and illegal immigration must be stopped without exception.
Click to expand...
Wow! White supremacy doesn’t get any clearer than that! Essentially what the “America First” caucus is saying is that:

1. Immigration needs to be shut down.
2. It needs to be shut down to preserve white (Anglo Saxon) heritage/culture from inferior elements that cannot or will not assimilate or contribute positively to the country.

Compare what Tucker spews nightly, it’s pure white supremacy. Also, using terms like, “Anglo Saxon” is yet another bullhorn for white supremacy.

Outstanding threads by some of the best historians in the nation:




One of the links isn’t working. Here’s the write up “preserving” Anglo Saxon Heritage from 1963’s The Cross and the Flag:
BAC2EE3E-6896-4250-9F91-BAF3D9CD19CB.png
How is this anything different than what Tucker And republicans are saying right now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
Red said:
The policy platform of the America First Caucus:


And the platform’s opening paragraphs on immigration:

Immigration
The America First Caucus recognizes that our country is more than a mass of consumers or a series of abstract ideas. America is a nation with a border, and a culture, strengthened by a common respect for uniquely Anglo-Saxon political traditions. History has shown that societal trust and political unity are threatened when foreign citizens are imported en-masse into a country, particularly without institutional support for assimilation and an expansive welfare state to bail them out should they fail to contribute positively to the country. While certain economic and financial interest groups benefit immensely from mass immigration, legal as well as illegal, and the aggregate output of the country increases, the reality of large segments of our society as well as the long-term existential future of America as a unique country with a unique culture and a unique identity being put at unnecessary risk is something our leaders can afford to ignore no longer.

As such, America’s legal immigration system should be curtailed to those that can contribute not only economically, but have demonstrated respect for this nation’s culture and rule of law. America’s borders must be defended, and illegal immigration must be stopped without exception.
Click to expand...
The “America First” caucus is dangerous. I’m afraid they’re already taking their radical views mainstream. The reach of Fox News and Facebook combined with the institutional advantages of the electoral college and Senate, make these dangerously racist and reactionary views being so embedded in one political party and large swaths of our population, a clear threat to our democracy.

What, can be done to fight it? And how do moderates regain control of their GOP when they aren’t willing to resist such radicalism? Cheney is a top GOP leader yet this is a ridiculously weak response:



If republicans really want to end radicalism in their sorry party, then they need to strip these members of their committees and even kick them out of the party. You can’t keep playing footsies with racists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Red
The Thriller said:
The “America First” caucus is dangerous. I’m afraid they’re already taking their radical views mainstream. The reach of Fox News and Facebook combined with the institutional advantages of the electoral college and Senate, make these dangerously racist and reactionary views being so embedded in one political party and large swaths of our population, a clear threat to our democracy.

What, can be done to fight it? And how do moderates regain control of their GOP when they aren’t willing to resist such radicalism? Cheney is a top GOP leader yet this is a ridiculously weak response:



If republicans really want to end radicalism in their sorry party, then they need to strip these members of their committees and even kick them out of the party. You can’t keep playing footsies with racists.
Click to expand...

It’s remindful of the mid 19th century emergence of the “Know Nothing’s”, and the brief success of the American Party.

www.smithsonianmag.com

How the 19th-Century Know Nothing Party Reshaped American Politics

From xenophobia to conspiracy theories, the Know Nothing party launched a nativist movement whose effects are still felt today
www.smithsonianmag.com www.smithsonianmag.com

American Patriot was a short lived weekly which allied with the American Party. Note the call for a 21 year wait before an immigrant would be allowed to vote! This poster was published in Boston in 1854, when immigration from Ireland and Germany, mostly Roman Catholics, reached its height.

65931221-9BC5-4C41-9341-111C3730F251.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Red said:
It’s remindful of the mid 19th century emergence of the “Know Nothing’s”, and the brief success of the American Party.

www.smithsonianmag.com

How the 19th-Century Know Nothing Party Reshaped American Politics

From xenophobia to conspiracy theories, the Know Nothing party launched a nativist movement whose effects are still felt today
www.smithsonianmag.com www.smithsonianmag.com

American Patriot was a short lived weekly which allied with the American Party. Note the call for a 21 year wait before an immigrant would be allowed to vote! This poster was published in Boston in 1854, when immigration from Ireland and Germany, mostly Roman Catholics, reached its height.

View attachment 10581
Click to expand...
What prevented the Know Nothing’s from taking political power? What prevented them from hijacking one of the two major political parties?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top