3rd, not 2nd.
W/e. Point still stands.
Hopefully Gordon can develop all these skills before his athleticism begins to decline.
3rd, not 2nd.
You keep saying stuff like, "Aaron Gordon with a jumpshot is the 2nd best player in the draft" - or something along those lines. The fact is, he doesn't have that currently, so that's why he's positioned where he's positioned. Andrew Wiggins with better shooting and ball-handling would be the unanimous number one pick, but again, no one can currently have a potential skill.
Can Gordon develop that? Sure, but Parker is way beyond him in the skills department and would have potential too.
You should attempt to put a semi-realistic trade-up scenario for the Jabari pick. Otherwise your poll is gonna read like 'Parker or Gordon', and it probably will not be very close.
Nobody is drafted in the top 5 as a finished product anymore. Teams draft for the long haul or potential. So yes while Gordon shot poorly as a franchise you have to project if that's something that's correctable or not. If they all selected finished products there would be a lot less bust. Which is why the league is pushing to make college kids stay longer.
Parker is a rare position because his skill-set is seen as NBA ready while still being a young enough prospect to still improve. However because he is limited athletically at this stage it's a huge question mark just how much better he can get.
This is not to say that Parker is an inferior prospect to Gordon or that Arron has a great chance to be drafted ahead of Jabari. Just saying that when you have a player with the physical gifts as Gordon with all the IQ, hustle, and intagibles I wouldn't be shocked if he turns out to be the better player 5 years from now.
I am well aware of all this and would not be shocked if Gordon was better eventually. But I don't think that will happen, so I'll take Parker.
Big Board:
1. Embiid
2. Wiggins
3. Gordon
4. Parker
5. Exum
I voted Parker just cuz it would be too hard to pass up on that polished of an offensive player.
Perfectly fine and I think you are in the majority with that opinion.
What I disagreed with is your stance that it's somehow bad drafting policy to take a player with the assumption that he'll get better. When that's practically what the draft has become.

Nobody is drafted in the top 5 as a finished product anymore. Teams draft for the long haul or potential. So yes while Gordon shot poorly as a franchise you have to project if that's something that's correctable or not. If they all selected finished products there would be a lot less bust. Which is why the league is pushing to make college kids stay longer.
Parker is a rare position because his skill-set is seen as NBA ready while still being a young enough prospect to still improve. However because he is limited athletically at this stage it's a huge question mark just how much better he can get.
This is not to say that Parker is an inferior prospect to Gordon or that Arron has a great chance to be drafted ahead of Jabari. Just saying that when you have a player with the physical gifts as Gordon with all the IQ, hustle, and intagibles I wouldn't be shocked if he turns out to be the better player 5 years from now.
But for the record, total minutes of basketball LazyD has seen Aaron Gordon play: 0