What's new
By:

Utah Jazz 2018-19 Championship Bus CHOO CHOO

Alfalfa said:
He takes a lot of shots with no chance of going in to draw the big and allow Gobert a second chance opportunity. His stats would be slightly better if it wasn't for that. Like, not good. But not the worst either.
Click to expand...

He also misses a lot of bunny layups...
 
fishonjazz said:
So for 10 years he has been scoring 32 points per on 15 shots?
Let me check the Google and see if you are correct.
If we look his last 5 years which is a pretty good sample he hasn't averaged over 19 points per game at all. He is about 13 shots for 17 points per game.
Seems that one game sample you provided isn't his normal production just like I suspected.

I mean whenever you can pay 30+ million dollars per year to a 30+ year old injury prone no defense having player that can get you 17 points per game on about 42% from the field and about 37% from 3..... I mean you have to do it right? Oh and also give up players or picks for the opportunity to overpay that old injury prone no defense player who is ok on offense.
I mean maybe if Cleveland gives us a few 1st rounders to take him off their hands then we should consider it.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
Lol, sure dude. We're paying someone 11 million a year to never do anything so why not pay someone 30 mill a year that can actually play. Love > Favors and Exum
 
Shad said:
Lol, sure dude. We're paying someone 11 million a year to never do anything so why not pay someone 30 mill a year that can actually play. Love > Favors and Exum
Click to expand...
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Your argument seems to be that since we gave X a bad contract we should go and try and get another bad contract.
Not the best plan imo
As for your last sentence. Favors is easily the better defensive player and statistically he is the better offensive player as well. And he isn't over 30 years old. And he misses less games. And doesn't cost 30 million

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
So, with the bottom falling out for the Clippers, Lakers, and Spurs, it appears that our floor of a sixth seed looks better and better. Hope the Kings get one of those spots.
 
Crappy thing about the Lakers is they probably get two big names in the offseason and vault into the 2, 3, or 4 seed next year just because they're LA.
 
fishonjazz said:
Two wrongs don't make a right.
Your argument seems to be that since we gave X a bad contract we should go and try and get another bad contract.
Not the best plan imo
As for your last sentence. Favors is easily the better defensive player and statistically he is the better offensive player as well. And he isn't over 30 years old. And he misses less games. And doesn't cost 30 million

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
2 wrongs don't make a right, but 3 rights make a left. Think about it.
 
framer said:
So, with the bottom falling out for the Clippers, Lakers, and Spurs, it appears that our floor of a sixth seed looks better and better. Hope the Kings get one of those spots.
Click to expand...
They give the Warriors trouble. It would be a fun matchup
 
LifeOnaPlate said:
Crappy thing about the Lakers is they probably get two big names in the offseason and vault into the 2, 3, or 4 seed next year just because they're LA.
Click to expand...

Unless they liquidate they only have one max slot, no? I think Brooklyn is a far better destination for the top tier free agent, far better team and it would be YOUR team. Also Eastern conference. Lakers haven't been to the playoffs in six years. At some point they begin to get that Knick stench.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top