What's new
By:

Utah Jazz offseason ranked #4 by NBA.com

BabyPeterzz said:
It's an Insider. Will you please paraphrase for us? Thanks.
Click to expand...

Dont believe he actually mentions the Jazz. It is just the top 5 teams in the offseason who made good moves. Some of this is just a money thing such as the Spurs for signing Splitter to such a cheap deal.
 
gomretat said:
Chicago being ranked ahead of us is no surprise at all. The only place on the planet that would not be true is in Utah. There is a lot of kool-aid in Zion right now.
Click to expand...

Or we just know exactly what Chicago got in Carlos Boozer. I'm gonna laugh my *** off if he gets hurt at some point this season and misses 20+ games. And how long do you give the Chicago fans before they start screaming about Brewer clanking outside shots? Korver will get a free pass for a while because he looks like a certain actor.
 
GlassEater said:
I'm more amazed by this quote: "Now, Rose can have the rock in his hands all he wants, with legit scoring options in the paint and behind the 3-point line (Brewer could really shine in this offense)."

Huh, Brewer is a 3-pt threat? Who knew.


And to think we probably would have been #30 until the Jefferson trade and Raja signing. How quickly things can change!
Click to expand...

LOL. I'm pretty damn sure they were talking about Korver there, not the Brickman Brewer.
 
relative to last year, chicago has had a MUCH better offseason than the jazz. the bulls barely made the playoffs last season and now are looking like a top 4 seed for sure, maybe even higher. they picked up probably 10+ wins this offseason.

the jazz did a good job pulling a rabbit out of a hat, but they didn't get better. they'll be lucky to match last year's 53 wins. if they surpass it, it won't be by much.
 
theNBAnerd said:
relative to last year, chicago has had a MUCH better offseason than the jazz. the bulls barely made the playoffs last season and now are looking like a top 4 seed for sure, maybe even higher. they picked up probably 10+ wins this offseason.

the jazz did a good job pulling a rabbit out of a hat, but they didn't get better. they'll be lucky to match last year's 53 wins. if they surpass it, it won't be by much.
Click to expand...

Why don't you think the Jazz got better?
 
theNBAnerd said:
relative to last year, chicago has had a MUCH better offseason than the jazz. the bulls barely made the playoffs last season and now are looking like a top 4 seed for sure, maybe even higher. they picked up probably 10+ wins this offseason.

the jazz did a good job pulling a rabbit out of a hat, but they didn't get better. they'll be lucky to match last year's 53 wins. if they surpass it, it won't be by much.
Click to expand...

agreed with you until your statement about the jazz being better. They are better, marginally better, but still better. The locker room, and players that want too win far surpass the dopes that left. This team looks to have desire which boozer certainly lacked.
 
This is a ranking for just the offseason moves as the article clearly claims. I am not sure what everyone is whining about. Jazz merely compensated for their losses, but did a good job of that nevertheless. #4 sounds right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top