What's new

Utah vs. Boise in Las Vegas Bowl

Instead of trying to spin yet another argument, tell me I'm dead wrong about what I posted. Problem is, you can't.
Oh I see. So you can ask for quotes and posts but I can't? LOL! Ever the hypocrite.

But whatever, I'll play your game. You are posted that I am saying BYU never wanted Langi. That is not true and you are a liar for posting it.
 
Instead of trying to spin yet another argument
How is there spin? It's true and you know it. You can't stand that I have info you don't have. It eats at you and we all know it. It shows in your posts. But yet, when I post something that aligns with your opinion you are quick to use me as proof of your opinion. That's not spin that's exactly what went down.

Spinning by claiming spin. Priceless, Chief.
 
How is there spin? It's true and you know it. You can't stand that I have info you don't have. It eats at you and we all know it. It shows in your posts. But yet, when I post something that aligns with your opinion you are quick to use me as proof of your opinion. That's not spin that's exactly what went down.

Spinning by claiming spin. Priceless, Chief.


Again can you answer the question, or simply continue to dance around with your rhetoric in an effort to make yourself look better?
 
Again can you answer the question, or simply continue to dance around with your rhetoric in an effort to make yourself look better?
I did and you couldn't pull up any quotes. I am satisfied that you are a liar. Now if you want to continue to dance around that's fine.
 
But whatever, I'll play your game. You are posted that I am saying BYU never wanted Langi. That is not true and you are a liar for posting it.

Conan, you do realize that there's a difference between lying and being mistaken, right? To quote Napoleon: "Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."
 
Go back a few posts to Conan's quote:


Let's pretend that you're not trying to win an argument and be honest with each other. You know damn well what's going on at Bingham. And for the record, I didn't accuse Bingham of any cheating or wrongdoing. Just like Sklyine did for so long and even Northridge a few years back when they were winning multiple titles with Fred Fernandez, Bingham is very good at taking the current system of rules and manipulating them in their favor when it comes to getting talented players who may not live within school boundries.

Now, I'll still conceed this portion of the argument to you because I obviously cannot provide all of the home addresses for all of the Bingham players (but you knew that when you asked that idiotic question, didn't you?). Because having access to the home addresses of over 100 teenage boys seems, well it seems just a little bit creepy. Seems like something more up your ally.

What a cop out...

So basically, you say that "they" have its "choice" of athletes on the Wasatch front, as if recruiting was legal in HS athletics, then you cannot describe who "they" are, what they do, how they do it, and to what extent. As if the "best" programs in Utah got the most athletes outside their boundaries since... Well, they're successful programs, right? In HS unlike college, there's no real limit to the amount of players one can have on their team. So if recruiting is rampant, wouldn't you think that a successful team like Bingham would have many more recruits than a losing team like Orem?

Again, I think you're letting opinion substitute for facts in this matter.
 
Conan, you do realize that there's a difference between lying and being mistaken, right? To quote Napoleon: "Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."

There are a lot of great lines from that movie but I don't remember that one. :p

Napoleon, don't be jealous that I've been chatting online with babes all day. Besides, we both know that I'm training to be a cage fighter

:p
 
Conan, you do realize that there's a difference between lying and being mistaken, right? To quote Napoleon: "Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by incompetence."
Sure, but what if it's a combination of malice and incompetence?

Feel free to try reasoning with these guys. Go back and read yourself and you'll see I tried to correct them. They don't take kindly to the truth.
 
Back
Top