What's new
By:

Utah's Future Starting Point Guard...?

Dynamic young point guards are hard to find, unless you are Sacramento. I would take a shot at him, but would rather try to pry Bledsoe away from the Clippers if they re-sign Chris Paul.
 
candrew said:
That's pretty much the comparison I was going to make. I've heard Bucks fan comment on how they play better as a team when Ridinour runs the point.

I think Jennings will always put up flashy numbers; but he'll never win a thing. Don't want him.
Click to expand...

Speaking of, Ridnour is the type of player the Jazz should target and will end up with anyway. A passed around point guard who will play for cheap. There is no solution at point guard outside the draft.

Mo Williams is the best option. Extend him for less money and grab a backup.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
I'd rather find a young pg, and make him earn his big contract. Jennings is a punk, and I don't think he'd be good in the locker room. I dont think he does anything to help the young 4 progress.
Click to expand...
Likely two 1st round picks. Jazz may combine them to move up, or go PG and Big (depending on what they decide or hear from the agents for Al and Paul).
 
candrew said:
That's pretty much the comparison I was going to make. I've heard Bucks fan comment on how they play better as a team when Ridinour runs the point.

I think Jennings will always put up flashy numbers; but he'll never win a thing. Don't want him.
Click to expand...

Bucks fans are lost in the past. Ridnour hasn't played for the Bucks for the past 2 seasons.

Jennings isn't a winner a say no.
 
No thanks. He wants too much money and he wants to play in a big market. Besides the fact he is a gunner and not a very good shooter.
 
Jennings is a selfish chucker who destroys the chemistry. I do not understand how people value him just looking at the statistics. Before judging , all you need is watching Bucks game. It's like shooting competition between Jennings and Ellis.
 
I'm wondering if the Jazz are going to be content playing 30something vet PGs from here on out. They'll have enough cash tied up with Favors, Kanter, Hayward, Burks that they won't have enough to retain a top PG. So, maybe they've decided that it's the best bang for the buck to just rely on guys with no upside but lots of experience.
 
jazzfan1971 said:
I'm wondering if the Jazz are going to be content playing 30something vet PGs from here on out. They'll have enough cash tied up with Favors, Kanter, Hayward, Burks that they won't have enough to retain a top PG. So, maybe they've decided that it's the best bang for the buck to just rely on guys with no upside but lots of experience.
Click to expand...

It works for most teams that win Championships. What's the last team to win it all that had a great PG?

Does Parker count with the Spurs? Debatable

Magic with the Lakers, but he also had a great Front court and wings. Is the Front court and/or wings the main reason they won it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top