D
I dunno, how can we be sure that they want a civil war? Oh wait…Lol
One side actually wants a civil war. They literally want to murder and eradicate the other side. Now thats what I call animosity.
Btw there is no way to statically show the amount of animosity a faction of a party has for the other party so you are lying. Its simply your opinion that the left has more animosity for the right than vice versa. A stupid opinion but an opinion none the less.
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
I can't wait to hear about how a theory discussed primarily by minority professors can create any sort of overage over people like you.Don't you realisze that CRT is just a twist on Marxist tactics for creating leverage over a susceptible population.
Because she got maced. You really miss the obvious all over the place.Oh my god, she's in tears because someone pushed her.
Different people in different places got different treatment.Wow she made it one foot inside, where other videos show police opening the doors for folks. They did not use mace on anyone.
A woman who was in the process of criminal trespass. You don't believe in self-defense?They did shoot one woman, who was unarmed.
Those social scientists who conducted the poll I linked earlier sure must feel silly now that you've said what they did is beyond human achievement. Here is the poll again that formed the statistical basis for the conclusions I said I had seen reported.Btw there is no way to statically show the amount of animosity a faction of a party has for the other party
What they did is well within human achievement, it just didn't amount to statistically showing the amount of animosity a faction of a party has for the other party.Those social scientists who conducted the poll I linked earlier sure must feel silly now that you've said what they did is beyond human achievement.
Let’s be blunt. The United States has become two nations occupying the same country. When pressed, or in private, many would now agree. Fewer are willing to take the next step and accept that most people living in the United States today—certainly more than half—are not Americans in any meaningful sense of the term.
I don’t just mean the millions of illegal immigrants. Obviously, those foreigners who have bypassed the regular process for entering our country, and probably will never assimilate to our language and culture, are—politically as well as legally—aliens. I’m really referring to the many native-born people—some of whose families have been here since the Mayflower—who may technically be citizens of the United States but are no longer (if they ever were) Americans. They do not believe in, live by, or even like the principles, traditions, and ideals that until recently defined America as a nation and as a people. It is not obvious what we should call these citizen-aliens, these non-American Americans; but they are something else.
Practically speaking, there is almost nothing left to conserve. What is actually required now is a recovery, or even a refounding, of America as it was long and originally understood but which now exists only in the hearts and minds of a minority of citizens.
If you are a zombie or a human rodent who wants a shadow-life of timid conformity, then put away this essay and go memorize the poetry of Amanda Gorman…. The U.S. Constitution no longer works
In the meantime, give up on the idea that “conservatives” have anything useful to say. Accept the fact that what we need is a counter-revolution. Learn some useful skills, stay healthy, and get strong. (One of my favorite weightlifting coaches likes to say, “Strong people are harder to kill, and more useful generally.”)
Ashli Babbit would most likely still be alive today if she hadn’t broken into the Capitol and threatened the lives of lawmakers by attempting to interfere with the certification of the election.Because she got maced. You really miss the obvious all over the place.
Different people in different places got different treatment.
A woman who was in the process of criminal trespass. You don't believe in self-defense?
Those social scientists who conducted the poll I linked earlier sure must feel silly now that you've said what they did is beyond human achievement. Here is the poll again that formed the statistical basis for the conclusions I said I had seen reported.
![]()
Young Democrats more likely to despise the other party
37% of Democrats wouldn't befriend someone who voted for the other party.www.axios.com
Because she got maced. You really miss the obvious all over the place.
A woman who was in the process of criminal trespass. You don't believe in self-defense?
You're just making things up to suit your preferred narrative. Very convenient to live in a fantasy world of your own making.She said....... OK, she had a reddened face. Different people in different places got different treatment. But being "pushed out" from one foot inside sounds like she was easily handled. Maybe she got some mace when it was used on someone else near her. She's a pushover. I don't believe her at all. The microphone and picture context betray the fact that she was not "real" as one of the protestors. It was a set-up interview. Anyone with an axe to grind can do that kind of fake media. Like I said, she doesn't present the right set of ideas or issues, and uses language, and mannerisms unlike the sort of people who would go to a Trump rally. Where is the MAGA hat, where is the light jacket or sweater? Really, is this January in DC? Not falling like a dupe for a scam is not "Missing the obvious all over the place".
They opened the doors to let her in from the side of the building, I believe. She was unarmed, had nothing in her hands. There was a door in the hall that was being held shut by officers, with a broken window on the side, as I recall from the video footage. There was a policeman behind her, and one in front. I think she was nuts being there, or thinking there was something for her to do there. She could have been maced or tased, or the officers could simply have seized her and put handcuffs on her, This was not a jusrtifiable shooting. The officers involved should be arrested and charged like other police who do unjustified shootings.
Her mental illness and inability to pose significant danger to others is compelling reason to use restraint.
If you believe this is a "minority" professorial theory, why is it being taught in colleges that train teachers, and why is the material being worked into school curricula.I can't wait to hear about how a theory discussed primarily by minority professors can create any sort of overage over people like you.
You're just making things up to suit your preferred narrative. Very convenient to live in a fantasy world of your own making.
This is pretty desperate denialism. Nobody believes polls can't be biased or that sample size/method can't give way off results. The questions asked, the tone..... all deflectr peoples responses in some manner.So you think that:
A. 850 college students is a good sample size for however many people are in a political party? (Like 100 million or something like that). Pretty stupid.
B. You think that people cant lie when polled? Pretty stupid. Are they hooked up to lie detectors while being questioned.
C. You think that not wanting to date someone equals animosity. I dont want to/wouldnt date a smoker but that doesnt mean i have animosity towards smokers.
D. You think that polls are never bias.
E. You think that polls are always accurate and therefore Hillary clinton was the president from 2016 to 2020.
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
It’s pretty obvious that most of the hate AOC gets from the right is exactly because of this. Many are just angry that she’s hot as hell and they have no shot at her.
It’s interesting to consider that a great deal of anger from the right is caused by sexual frustration. I read a book not too long ago that tied a great deal of right wing authoritarianism in europe to sexual frustrations of young men. When you look at the demographics of those at Jan 6, you can definitely see a pattern. Rural, conservative, and evangelical communities have yet to figure out how to deal with sex and sex education in a healthy manner.
CRT is not being taught to undergraduate teachers, nor is it being worked in any curricula below the post-graduate level.If you believe this is a "minority" professorial theory, why is it being taught in colleges that train teachers, and why is the material being worked into school curricula.
Which ideas have I pushed that are specifically central to CRT, as opposed to other social theories about race and oppression? When you find it impossible to name any, will you acknowledge as much?You have been pushing associated ideas in here yourself.
Now if you said that about all the hate Nancy Pelosi gets I might have to give that one to you. AOC is okay I guess but who among us can't admit that Nancy Pelosi is a smoke show? The idea of her popping those dentures of hers out into a little glass beside the bed makes me want to spout all kinds of things on twitter. Grrrr......grrrr....meow.It’s pretty obvious that most of the hate AOC gets from the right is exactly because of this. Many are just angry that she’s hot as hell and they have no shot at her.