Haven’t seen this posted yet. We’ll be picking 29th. Article also does a good job highlighting how we lose every tie breaker.
We mentioned it in another thread. But yeah. Sucks to suck.Haven’t seen this posted yet. We’ll be picking 29th. Article also does a good job highlighting how we lose every tie breaker.
We need to hire someone to head up our tie breaker department. Anyone got any suggestions?We mentioned it in another thread. But yeah. Sucks to suck.
I suggested DA start asking to get tiebreaker coin toss rights in trade. Imagine if we had traded KO/Ochai for a late first AND a coin toss tiebreaker with no expiration date.We need to hire someone to head up our tie breaker department. Anyone got any suggestions?
I think you can take one of those picks and a medium salary and mover up as well. 32 for 22 and we assume Nas Little's contract for example.If the Jazz were to package 29 + 32, they might get as high as 21-23 with teams that need to maneuver around the LT.
We should hire Chance Comanche. That way we'll mostly likely have a better Chance than our opponent.We need to hire someone to head up our tie breaker department. Anyone got any suggestions?
Yep. I mentioned the Little contract a few days ago and it makes a ton of sense to absorb that if we can jump 7 or more spots. Trading 32 for 22 would be great but I would be fine doing 29 as well.I think you can take one of those picks and a medium salary and mover up as well. 32 for 22 and we assume Nas Little's contract for example.
I don't know that many teams in the 15-25 range are looking for more picks as some (like NO and NY) already have multiple picks. I still say one of the picks is moved... the Bronny Lakers trade scenario is the one I am staring at. I could also see them moving 32 for a late second for a two way guy and multiple future seconds to fill the coffers back up.