We need some general rules for posters who routinely engage in “bad faith” discussion tactics.

[JazzyFresh]

You're the only one who can't figure out that you were talking about him directly when you created this thread. He owns you so completely it's frightening.

Lol dude told me he ignored me for the third time... Got all his friends together to ignore me... Now he's @'tting me.

 

[Gameface]

You're the only one who can't figure out that you were talking about him directly when you created this thread. He owns you so completely it's frightening.

Whahahaha. Sthopppp... you're killing me.

Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[NAOS]

You're the only one who can't figure out that you were talking about him directly when you created this thread. He owns you so completely it's frightening.

Lololol. You get further out of orbit with each passing year. Ol’ Joe Bag.

 

[NAOS]

Lol dude told me he ignored me for the third time... Got all his friends together to ignore me... Now he's @'tting me.

Of course you have no idea what you’re talking about. Thanks for being a black light on JFC, though. Funny to watch the clowns who have emerged and given you some shade. You seem ****ing thirsty for it.

 

[NAOS]

This is August 30th. I have never said a negative word about @NAOS before this. I didn't even know who the guy was. I find your victim playing extremely hypocritical and you even start a "nark tattle" thread when it's YOU who is guilty of everything you victimly blame others of. You're just mad that I don't take your bullying. The best way to handle a bully is to give them a taste of their own medicine. They really lose their toughness and do things like run home to Mom and Dad, in @NAOS case the mods. It's weakness.

Anyway heres @NAOS attacking me for no reason.


I handled it myself. Now look at @NAOS not able to do the same. It says a lot imo.

The ignore feature is a wonderful thing. If you need mods to silence somebody because you are incapable of handling a situation yourself I think you may need some sort on counseling. I'm not saying that to be a jerk but letting someone get to you this much is an obvious weakness that is a you problem not a mod problem. Remember as you chill in your world of playing victim. You are the one calling me "soft boi". I'm not calling you any names. Hell i never even knew you existed until you started hating on me for no reason. You dish it but cannot take it.

@NAOS

@ing people is a problem gais.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

Lololol. You get further out of orbit with each passing year. Ol’ Joe Bag.

You still think slinging insults is the key to winning arguments. Some things never change.

Back on subject, I don't spend much time on this site anymore so there are undoubtedly a lot of conversations I know nothing about. What I do know is that I recently read an endless squabble between you and Jazzy which seems to relate directly to the complaints in your OP. I think it was in the Impeach Trump thread, and it was very recent. Are there really people (other than naos) who believe a reasonable argument can be made that he wasn't thinking about Jazzy when he created this thread?

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

@ing people is a problem gais.

Somehow I missed the posts where he bragged about putting you on ignore and begged everyone else to follow suit. Could you please point those out as well?

 

[NAOS]

Comes into a thread, admits ignorance, claims a high road, doubles down. Copy that.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

Comes into a thread, admits ignorance, claims a high road, doubles down. Copy that.

Creates a thread, feigns ignorance, claims a high road, doubles down. Copy that.

 

[NAOS]

Creates a thread, feigns ignorance, claims a high road, doubles down. Copy that.

So I guess the elephant in the room is your admission of ignorance. What do we want to do about that in this case? I can’t see a way forward here (or a way to validate your claim that I’m feigning ignorance) unless we deal with that.

So, you choose. What’s next?

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

So I guess the elephant in the room is your admission of ignorance. What do we want to do about that in this case? I can’t see a way forward here (or a way to validate your claim that I’m feigning ignorance) unless we deal with that.

So, you choose. What’s next?

This can be solved very easily. Provide links to the posts that motivated you to create this thread. It's hard to believe you missed this obvious solution.

 

[NAOS]

This can be solved very easily. Provide links to the posts that motivated you to create this thread. It's hard to believe you missed this obvious solution.

I’m aware of the fact that you think you know exactly what was in my thoughts. And I’m aware that you are confident of your read on the situation—despite your many deficits in knowledge and experience on this matter. But now you want me to pretend that you didn’t start out with a ridiculous premise (What is NAOS thinking?), AND you want me to do your research for you, too?

I think I’ve seen this tactic before. Pretty ****ing insulting, if you ask me. Grats.