What's new

Welcome to 'Murica

Soooooo are we just going to ignore that this dude was explicitly targeting Christians? Anybody today who is killing people because they don't agree with their belief sets, that's a messed up person.

If true, it is disturbing. As far as I have seen, he wasn't SOLELY targeting Xtians - if someone said they weren't Xtian, nobody has reported that he passed them by. If that's the case, then he was probably just being a jackass - what a shock.

There's a whole lot of if's involved in that report, basically.
 
Jim, still waiting on a response.

That was a serious question? Of course I've had none. Just like I've had no experience with heroin but I can diss it before I've tried it. Guns serve no purpose but to kill people. Simple as that.
 
That was a serious question? Of course I've had none. Just like I've had no experience with heroin but I can diss it before I've tried it. Guns serve no purpose but to kill people. Simple as that.

what's your diss on heroin? pls be specific.
 
That was a serious question? Of course I've had none. Just like I've had no experience with heroin but I can diss it before I've tried it. Guns serve no purpose but to kill people. Simple as that.

Simple not true. Hunting, recreation. It's even an Olympic sport.
 
That was a serious question? Of course I've had none. Just like I've had no experience with heroin but I can diss it before I've tried it. Guns serve no purpose but to kill people. Simple as that.

also, are you being serious right now?
 
But wouldn't him targeting a religious group, Christians, in this case make it a hate crime/terrorism?

Fair enough. Charge him extra with the hate crime.

Or he's dead. So what's the point?

Oh yeah, to make political points. To anger, divide, and accuse.

Whee, the "Fewer guns would be nice but it'll never happen. See you next mass shooting" continues.
 
That was a serious question? Of course I've had none. Just like I've had no experience with heroin but I can diss it before I've tried it. Guns serve no purpose but to kill people. Simple as that.

Is that a serious response? I've used guns for many, many things, yet I've never killed a person. How is that possible?!

I think you should try to educate yourself on guns a little more before you spew out popular rhetoric.
 
Fair enough. Charge him extra with the hate crime.

Or he's dead. So what's the point?

Oh yeah, to make political points. To anger, divide, and accuse.

Whee, the "Fewer guns would be nice but it'll never happen. See you next mass shooting" continues.


Whee pointless arguments!

Political points against who exactly? To divide who? Those who favor killing people based on religion from those that don't?

What an absurd response.
 
Is that a serious response? I've used guns for many, many things, yet I've never killed a person. How is that possible?!

I think you should try to educate yourself on guns a little more before you spew out popular rhetoric.

I'm genuinely curious to those many things.

My use of firearms have been two fold. Killing something (hunting), or becoming more proficient at killing something (range shooting).

I can't think of any proficient, responsible use of a firearm that doesn't involve killing something. I mean, I can't think of any use of one as a tool that is more efficient than something else.
 
For the record I wanted to know what people thought about him targeting a specific group. New insight and all that.
 
Back
Top