MVP
Well-Known Member
Well, you can keep praying and believing that it will happen one day. I promise to post it here first if that ever happens. Chances are very low though...
What Do We Know About the Human Life-Span?
- Thread starter carolinajazz
- Start date
Well, you can keep praying and believing that it will happen one day. I promise to post it here first if that ever happens. Chances are very low though...
D
Deleted member 365
Guest
I have no idea why people take the Old Testament so literally.
Like the whole 7 days thing. Huh? Or the years thing.
If people knew how many times it's been translated, where it came from, what "it" is, etc I don't think they'd take it so literally.
It's not like the NT is much better. How many apostles and followers did Christ have? How many "gospels" do we have? Who was Luke?
Like the whole 7 days thing. Huh? Or the years thing.
If people knew how many times it's been translated, where it came from, what "it" is, etc I don't think they'd take it so literally.
It's not like the NT is much better. How many apostles and followers did Christ have? How many "gospels" do we have? Who was Luke?
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
....which brings us to another subject! (1 Corinthians 6:9-11) 9 Or do you not know that unrighteous people will not inherit God’s Kingdom? Do not be misled. Those who are sexually immoral, idolaters, adulterers, men who submit to homosexual acts, men who practice homosexuality, 10 thieves, greedy people, drunkards, revilers, and extortioners will not inherit God’s Kingdom. 11 And yet that is what some of you were. But you have been washed clean; you have been sanctified; you have been declared righteous in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and with the spirit of our God.
Doesn't sound "unconditional" to me! Does it sound that way to you?
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
Although no original Bible manuscripts have yet been found, thousands of handwritten copies of the whole Bible or portions of it have survived to our day. Some of them are very old. Did the message contained in the original texts change as it was copied?
Scholar W.*H.*Green stated concerning the Hebrew Scriptures: “It may be safely said that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted.”
Concerning the Christian Greek Scriptures, a leading authority on Bible manuscripts, Sir Frederic Kenyon, wrote: “The interval then between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the Scriptures have come down to us substantially as they were written has now been removed. Both the authenticity and the general integrity of the books of the New Testament may be regarded as finally established.” He also stated: “It cannot be too strongly asserted that in substance the text of the Bible is certain. .*.*. This can be said of no other ancient book in the world.”
PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
I realize it is fiction, but there was a really interesting theory about aging that I "read" in Robert Ludlum's book The Sigma Protocol that was an interesting perspective on how our longevity window could be shrinking rather than growing. I'll have to look if I can find the explanation of it. I could be remembering it wrongly.
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Heinlein has this type of thing at the core of a few of his books too. Good stuff.
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
How do we know that those handwritten copies weren't copied incorrectly to begin with?
Until you find a copy of the Pentateuch, for example, complete with a signature from Moses himself, verified by historians from all over the world, there is no good way to say that what we have is completely unadulterated.
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
You saw who started the thread, right?
♪alt13
Well-Known Member
Eventually. I originally followed your post here from the activity stream though.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
The original Bible books were evidently written on material as fragile as that used by the Phoenicians, Egyptians, and Romans. Why, then, did the material contained in the Bible survive to become the world’s most published book? Professor James L. Kugel provides one reason. He says that the original writings were copied “many, many times even within the biblical period itself.”
How do modern translations of the Bible compare with ancient manuscripts? Professor Julio Trebolle Barrera, a member of the team of experts charged with studying and publishing the ancient manuscripts known as the Dead Sea Scrolls, says: “The transmission of the text of the Hebrew Bible is of extraordinary exactitude, without parallel in Greek and Latin classical literature.” Respected Bible scholar F. F. Bruce says: “The evidence for our New Testament writings is ever so much greater than the evidence for many writings of classical authors, the authenticity of which no one dreams of questioning.” He continues: “If the New Testament were a collection of secular writings, their authenticity would generally be regarded as beyond all doubt.”
“The transmission of the text of the Hebrew Bible [Old Testament] is of extraordinary exactitude, without parallel in Greek and Latin classical literature.”—Professor Julio Trebolle Barrera
Still in existence today are some 6,000 handwritten copies of the Hebrew Scriptures, or Old Testament, and some 5,000 copies of the Greek Scriptures, or New Testament
Hebrew scrolls were produced, and handwritten copies of them were made. As these copies wore out or succumbed to the effects of humidity or mold, they had to be replaced. This process of copying went on for centuries.
Despite the care taken by Bible copyists, some errors inevitably crept in. But did the copyists’ mistakes substantially change the Bible text? No. On the whole, these errors are insignificant and have no bearing on the Bible’s general integrity, as proved by critical comparison of ancient manuscripts.
“In the number of ancient MSS. [manuscripts] attesting a writing, and in the number of years that had elapsed between the original and the attesting MSS., the Bible enjoys a decided advantage over classical writings [those of Homer, Plato, and others]. . . . Altogether classical MSS. are but a handful compared with Biblical. No ancient book is so well attested as the Bible.”—The Bible From the Beginning (New York, 1929), P. Marion Simms, pp. 74, 76.
In the introduction to his seven volumes on The Chester Beatty Biblical Papyri, Sir Frederic Kenyon wrote: “The first and most important conclusion derived from the examination of them [the papyri] is the satisfactory one that they confirm the essential soundness of the existing texts. No striking or fundamental variation is shown either in the Old or the New Testament. There are no important omissions or additions of passages, and no variations which affect vital facts or doctrines. The variations of text affect minor matters, such as the order of words or the precise words used . . . But their essential importance is their confirmation, by evidence of an earlier date than was hitherto available, of the integrity of our existing texts.”—(London, 1933), p. 15.
carolinajazz
Well-Known Member
....I started this thread only because AKMVP kept pressing me on how "laughable" the idea that men and women who lived close to the time when the perfect man Adam and perfect woman Eve......were created. could possibly have lived 500, 600 or up to 900 years. He fails to accept the fact that when Adam and Eve chose to be independent of their Maker, they fell from perfection. This was before they had any children. As a result, when they later had children, these reflected what the parents had become—imperfect.
When the first humans pulled away from their Creator’s direction, what happened to them is similar to what happens when you pull out the plug of an electric fan. As long as the fan is plugged into a power source, it runs. But when disconnected, it slows down and eventually comes to a dead stop. That is what happened when Adam and Eve pulled away from their Creator, “the source of life.” (Psalm 36:9) Since they willfully chose a course of independence from their Maker, he let them learn the full meaning of their choice by leaving them on their own. As a Bible principle states: “If you leave [God] he will leave you.” (2*Chronicles 15:2) Without their Creator’s sustaining power, a gradual breakdown of mind and body began. (Just like the fan that get's it's plugged pulled....it doesn't stop on a dime, but GRADUALLY slows down.) In time, they grew old and died.—Genesis 3:19; 5:5.
.....so this "aging" process began with Adam's disobedience, but it was gradual. Thus, those living close to the time of Adam and Eve lived a considerably longer time than those born centuries later. By the time of Moses, the average life span settled in to what it is basically today.
(Psalm 90:10) 10 In themselves the days of our years are seventy years; And if because of special mightiness they are eighty years,. . .