What's new
By:

What Happened to Katie?

Joe Bagadonuts said:
You're talking about the difference between making accommodations for a portion of the population who cannot participate in society without those accommodations, and making accommodations for a group who can function completely fine as is. Besides this, I heard the current government mandate read on the radio yesterday. It specifically said that transgendered people should not have to use their own special facilities. If that is really their position then your solution wouldn't work anyway. (BTW, if that really is their position I think it's pretty clear that this whole issue is more about creating a problem than solving one.)
Click to expand...

Joe Bagadonuts said:
And the percent of the population does matter. Do you seriously believe that every facility in America needs to be built to accommodate every single person, no matter how small a percent of the population they represent? If so we are going to be spending a hell of a lot to accommodate 700 pounders in public restrooms, through doorways, on airplanes, etc. But seriously, haven't these extra large people already suffered enough? It's the least we could do to remodel the world for them. Anyone who doesn't agree with me is obviously a bigot.
Click to expand...

Joe Bagadonuts said:
Whatever. I felt like I responded to all of your posts that were directed toward me but maybe I didn't adequately address some topic along the way. As to ratcheting up the animosity, I believe that the animosity around this issue has been created by the left. Why are they turning this into an issue? The answers might be found in this article:

https://www.wnd.com/2016/05/obamas-gender-identity-rules-go-beyond-bathrooms-showers/
Click to expand...

I had the multiquote thing going on because I was going to reply to all of your opinions, but the further through the thread I got, your responses got dumber by the sentence. I mean, that's perfect fodder and low hanging fruit for a guy like me who thrives on making stupid people look even more stupid than originally thought, but you beat me to the punch and added the ultimate, "I'm an absolute ****ing retard who can't think for myself" insult to yourself by actually citing a WND.com article to backup you flawed, idiotic, unbelievably ****-brained ideas. I have always known you were a little slow, probably have a few extra chromosomes rattling around in there, and were likely ravaged by your uncle's best friend's horse, but really, you've hit rock bottom. Please call Vinylone immediately and order his how-to book on how to successfully log out of life.

WND... Bwahaha, you can't make that kind of comedy up.
 
Does WND stand for woman next door? If so, it sounds kind of hot.
 
TroutBum said:
I had the multiquote thing going on because I was going to reply to all of your opinions, but the further through the thread I got, your responses got dumber by the sentence. I mean, that's perfect fodder and low hanging fruit for a guy like me who thrives on making stupid people look even more stupid than originally thought, but you beat me to the punch and added the ultimate, "I'm an absolute ****ing retard who can't think for myself" insult to yourself by actually citing a WND.com article to backup you flawed, idiotic, unbelievably ****-brained ideas. I have always known you were a little slow, probably have a few extra chromosomes rattling around in there, and were likely ravaged by your uncle's best friend's horse, but really, you've hit rock bottom. Please call Vinylone immediately and order his how-to book on how to successfully log out of life.

WND... Bwahaha, you can't make that kind of comedy up.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your incredibly enlightened contribution to the discussion.
 
TroutBum said:
I had the multiquote thing going on because I was going to reply to all of your opinions, but the further through the thread I got, your responses got dumber by the sentence. I mean, that's perfect fodder and low hanging fruit for a guy like me who thrives on making stupid people look even more stupid than originally thought, but you beat me to the punch and added the ultimate, "I'm an absolute ****ing retard who can't think for myself" insult to yourself by actually citing a WND.com article to backup you flawed, idiotic, unbelievably ****-brained ideas. I have always known you were a little slow, probably have a few extra chromosomes rattling around in there, and were likely ravaged by your uncle's best friend's horse, but really, you've hit rock bottom. Please call Vinylone immediately and order his how-to book on how to successfully log out of life.

WND... Bwahaha, you can't make that kind of comedy up.
Click to expand...

Your debate style reminds me of this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu9vR2XdprA
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Ultimately we probably won't agree on how this started, but I think it's abundantly clear that liberals are the ones who want to change the status quo on this issue.
Click to expand...

Damn liberals! If it wasn't for them, we'd probably still have segregation and be livin' the dream.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top