What's new

What PG do you want the jazz to go get?

PG for this season?

  • George Hill

    Votes: 21 27.3%
  • Darran Collison

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • Garrett Temple

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • Mario Chalmers

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • Jose Calderon

    Votes: 4 5.2%
  • Norris Cole

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Keep Burke, Neto, and Cotton as our PGs

    Votes: 27 35.1%
  • Keep Burke, Neto, and Cotton, but actively search for a trade during the season

    Votes: 16 20.8%

  • Total voters
    77
LOL at all the George Hill responses, He's 29!!! He's too far ahead of timeline the Jazz seem to be working around to give up the type of assets Indi will want back for him. Plain and simple, **** that.


Hate to say it (I'm not gonna say I want the Jazz to go get him) but the proper response to this thread is Mario Chalmers. He'd be an easy sell to the fans because of his championship pedigree, and because he's just a rental. Most importantly he can probably be had for a pittance, (Miami is over the tax threshold correct??) so its minimal risk.
 
problem is that Chalmers sux.



https://www.movienewsguide.com/nba-...chalmers-utah-jazz-probable-destination/83994 <-- FWIW thats obviously not a source I check, or find to be reliable.

For obvious reasons that headline caught my eye on another board. (in which Heat fans were acting like it was legit). The fact that no one sourced it here was enough proof of it being bogus in my eyes.

But yeah, and he'd disrupt the chemistry if they moved for him now. If **** falls apart however, I could see him in the in the fold as a stop-gap PG.
 
While I understand that Hill's age is a minus for us, his experience and fit would almost certainly buy us legitimacy and playoff experience RIGHT NOW. It's time for the older part of our core to get some playoff burn, and for the team as a whole to experience what is means to be GOOD in the postseason. If we have to spend a few assets to get that done, then I think it's value well spent. I certainly wouldn't give up the farm, but I'd do Burke, Lyles, and a second without hesitating.
 
(Of course, Lyles could prove me way wrong..... Right now, though, I see a guy that's a couple of years from being any kind of worthy defender.)
 
While I understand that Hill's age is a minus for us, his experience and fit would almost certainly buy us legitimacy and playoff experience RIGHT NOW. It's time for the older part of our core to get some playoff burn, and for the team as a whole to experience what is means to be GOOD in the postseason. If we have to spend a few assets to get that done, then I think it's value well spent. I certainly wouldn't give up the farm, but I'd do Burke, Lyles, and a second without hesitating.

Reading that last part, I put my hand up to my forehead like I had a brain freeze. No lie.

You could end up right, I just don't see it happening. Tha'ts a win-now move IMO.



I admit though, I seem to have a radically different opinion on what could happen during this next season and the next few, than many around here.

In short; I see the youth movement continuing.


long version;


Back during free agency, when cakes and baking were hot topics on Jazzfanz. I said (and got plenty of backlash over) that I thought the moves made, plus some interesting quotes from D.Lindsey, Indicated that with key injuries, that D-Lindsey would 'take his foot off the gas' and prep the tank for one last ride........ Dante's knee injury signals the first domino has already fallen, IMO.


I cited the very young team age as a reason why. Show me a truly competitive team that on average is around 24 years old... Even a team in the lowly eastern conference like Toronto last year, which was relatively close to 24 years of age on avg. got trounced in the playoffs..


The Jazz have the talent to compete, we all know that, the thing is, In the west what are they competing for... the 8th seed??? I'm sure you see that, and its why you value bringing in a veteran/experienced leadership, like Hill, which is totally understandable. However, I'd argue thats just not the direction the Jazz are headed in.

I truely hope they aren't going to unload these assets for anything less than a young stud. Complimentary or 'Need' pieces and the 2016 season sinking or swimming, pale in comparison In my eyes.

Jazz will use this season to further cut fat, and find muscle to replace it with.. IMO. If Burke doesn't show marked improvement, It will be in his and the Jazz best interests to move him, thats when I could see a rental like Chalmers being brought in. I think we will see enough improvement to keep Trey around in a back-up role for another year though.
 
LOL at all the George Hill responses, He's 29!!! He's too far ahead of timeline the Jazz seem to be working around to give up the type of assets Indi will want back for him. Plain and simple, **** that.


Hate to say it (I'm not gonna say I want the Jazz to go get him) but the proper response to this thread is Mario Chalmers. He'd be an easy sell to the fans because of his championship pedigree, and because he's just a rental. Most importantly he can probably be had for a pittance, (Miami is over the tax threshold correct??) so its minimal risk.

Not that it really changes your point (stopgap vs. long-term investment), but Chalmers is 29, as well. I was surprised to find that he's less than a month younger than Hill.
 
While I understand that Hill's age is a minus for us, his experience and fit would almost certainly buy us legitimacy and playoff experience RIGHT NOW. It's time for the older part of our core to get some playoff burn, and for the team as a whole to experience what is means to be GOOD in the postseason. If we have to spend a few assets to get that done, then I think it's value well spent. I certainly wouldn't give up the farm, but I'd do Burke, Lyles, and a second without hesitating.
Hell, I don't even think hills age is a minus

I would love if we could get hill without giving up any of the core
 
What about Jordan Clarkson?

Maybe we could talk the Lakers into parting ways. I wonder what their price would be.
 
Back
Top