What type of candidate can beat Trump?

[jazzrule]

You take drugs and call others strange. Look in the mirror.

 

[Gameface]

You take drugs and call others strange. Look in the mirror.

Holy **** man, learn how this works.

1 -- Hit the "reply" button.
2 -- Make sure the cursor (that vertical bar that flashes to show you where what you type will be placed) is below the quote (after the bracket that surrounds the word "/QUOTE").
3 -- Type your response.
4 -- Hit "Post Reply" button.
5 -- Pat yourself on the back for thinking that you're owning the libs.

 

[Gameface]

You take drugs and call others strange. Look in the mirror.

He has made it pretty clear, he isn't actively using any illegal drugs. He has been very open about past (like pre-marriage, pre-parent) drug use.

That guy is a stable productive person. He works a **** ton of overtime. He works at a place that drug tests.

He's one of the nicest people you could ever know. Just very genuine and fun to be around.

You're hang-up about him having used drugs is weird. I'm just going to guess you either live in Utah County or rural Utah and think judging people the way you have with Fish is normal. It's not.

 

[Safetydan]

Holy **** man, learn how this works.

1 -- Hit the "reply" button.
2 -- Make sure the cursor (that vertical bar that flashes to show you where what you type will be placed) is below the quote (after the bracket that surrounds the word "/QUOTE").
3 -- Type your response.
4 -- Hit "Post Reply" button.
5 -- Pat yourself on the back for thinking that you're owning the libs.

Thank you God (Gameface)

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

 

[Miggs]

Funny.

99% of Hollywood is liberal.

Celebrities = not good politicians and leaders(according to you)

So that must mean

Liberals do not equal good leaders and politicians.

I mean, it makes sense. Grownups detached from reality dont have a good sense of what works and what is realistic. And it makes perfect sense that Hollywood is 99% liberal.

Also, Donald Trump is 99% business man and 1% celebrity. He was doing business long before he had his show. So lets cut the crap and stop try to pretend that where he comes from.

Hack, a master of logic.

 

[fishonjazz]

You take drugs and call others strange. Look in the mirror.

What are you talking about?
What drugs?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[fishonjazz]

Hack, a master of logic.

Lol.
Hack was definitely joking with that post.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[silesian]

Yeah I think you're overating political experience.
Life experience, an actual vision, a 'theology' of worldview and fundamental values... That is more important than the skills you are talking about.

You wanna know why Trump will win again ... it's not cause of who he is. That only enabled him the spotlight to share what he stood for. His message and views defending western civilisation and the crisis of confidence it faces in light of left-wing extremism and zealots from overseas are the reasons he won and will win again.

If he wins again it is because a fraction vote pro life no matter how terrible the person

Another fraction vote low regulatory enforcement and taxes because it puts money into the trust fund, no matter how hideous the president.

And another fraction is terrified of the little brown people entering our country. Instead of being horrified by racist birtherism and other bigotry, they embrace it.

A fraction have been brainwashed by the carnival barker and actually believe he is competent.

All that said, any other prez with this sort of economy would be in the 60 % approval and not 40s. So there are enough moral and decent Americans to vote this clown out of office.

 

[Et tu Brute]

I think it will be the downfall of our great nation if that's the path we take.

Liberal celebrities are no better than conservative celebrities in this regard.

I am not sure anymore.....

The vision is what is most important. The vision can't be vague - but it must be concrete and reflect the

If he wins again it is because a fraction vote pro life no matter how terrible the person

Another fraction vote low regulatory enforcement and taxes because it puts money into the trust fund, no matter how hideous the president.

And another fraction is terrified of the little brown people entering our country.


Yea buddy.
We heard this well articulated as the 'deplorables'.

While ever the 'left' in the US and across the world derides the genuine and decent intentions of hardworking people - you will lose out. Until of course demographics change sufficiently.

You are going to get smashed in the next election. You will need Texas to shift to win another election. Not happening this cycle.

A fraction have been brainwashed by the carnival barker and actually believe he is competent.

Still he loses.

 

[LogGrad98]

Since of third of the angels went to hell, he might be right to do so.

That wouldn't be playing the odds.

 

[Deleted member 365]

If he wins again it is because a fraction vote pro life no matter how terrible the person

Another fraction vote low regulatory enforcement and taxes because it puts money into the trust fund, no matter how hideous the president.

And another fraction is terrified of the little brown people entering our country. Instead of being horrified by racist birtherism and other bigotry, they embrace it.

A fraction have been brainwashed by the carnival barker and actually believe he is competent.

All that said, any other prez with this sort of economy would be in the 60 % approval and not 40s. So there are enough moral and decent Americans to vote this clown out of office.

But which STATES disapprove of his performance?

Due to the EC, it’s not popular opinion but states that elects our presidents.

Trump realistically could lose the popular vote by wider margins than in 2016. He could lose it by 5-7 million yet if he wins certain key states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida), then he’s in no matter what the population thinks. Keep in mind, Russian hacking and disinformation campaigns will be at their strongest targeting those states.

 

[Deleted member 365]

The EC and senate are interesting anti-Democratic instruments right now.

Our nation’s population is becoming more diverse, urban, educated, less religious, and more liberal. Yet, the key midwestern states (rust belt) where the EC gives the most advantage to, are becoming less diverse, older, whiter, less educated, more religious, and more conservative. Their children may grow up on a farm or in an decrepit industrial city, but once they leave home and go to college, they’re most likely to leave for a costal “liberal” city. The same could be said about the Senate. A state like Wyoming remains stagnant, its population demographics haven’t changed in the past 30 years nearly as much as a state like Arizona or California. Yet it still wields as much power in the senate as any other state.

Our democracy is experiencing a civil war as the two driving factors are moving in opposite directions. The increasing disconnect between people (popular opinion) and government (EC and Senate)