What's new
By:

What Will You Do If Dl Resigns Ty???

infection said:
No. He's counting games that we're playing .500. I don't know why this is so hard to understand. Just man up and give Ty some ******* credit. Few coaches could lead this squad to play .500 ball the way Ty has.
Click to expand...

It's impressive that Ty has us playing .500 ball considering we aren't playing .500 ball.
 
Hantlers said:
It's impressive that Ty has us playing .500 ball considering we aren't playing .500 ball.
Click to expand...

I kind of get the argument. Take away the 1-14 start and the Jazz are 20-25. Stretch that over the entire season and it's still just 36-46. Injuries? Every team deals with them. I'm too lazy to look it up, but deduct for those 15 games and I'll bet the Jazz don't have an alarming number of games missed to injuries.

The other caveat is that you can't entirely dismiss the 1-14 start. It was a BRUTAL schedule with more away games than home, and a very tough SOS. Even with Burke, Evans and Williams all healthy from Day 1, I'd suggest the record may only have improved 3-5 games.

So let's be generous and give the Jazz 5 more wins over that stretch. They're now 26-34 with a winning % of .433. That translates to a 35-47 record.

Would 35-36 wins be overachieving with this squad? Remember, in both scenarios we've completely removed the effects of having Harris, Tinsley and Lucas in the lineup.
 
Hantlers said:
It's impressive that Ty has us playing .500 ball considering we aren't playing .500 ball.
Click to expand...

How the hell are we playing .500 ball?

What's our record again?

We are 18 games below .500. Even if you took out all those games which Trey missed we would be below .500.

We are 4-6 in our last 10. That's not .500 ball.

Is Miami playing sub .500 ball? OKC? Indy?

Am I on bizarro world now?

Seriously, how can anyone argue that we are playing .500 ball? I don't get it
 
The Thriller said:
Seriously, how can anyone argue that we are playing .500 ball? I don't get it
Click to expand...

We are just one major piece from playing .500 ball under Ty. With plenty of cap space we will have next season it's nothing but guaranteed .500 ball. I don't see why you guys are so close minded.
 
Ty isn't as bad as Jazzfanz says he is.



With that said, he isn't a top 5 coach in this league-- and seeing as we already have the cards stacked against us (due to small market), we NEED a well-coached team to thrive. Look at Indiana, San Antonio, and Utah of years passed: all were impacted by coaching.

I agree with frank in that coaching alone doesn't make a HUGE impact on the performances of a team, but that isn't a point.

As a small market team, we need every advantage we get.

This offseason, is Tyrone Corbin the best coach we can get? If the Jazz FO thinks so, then power to then. Personally, I have my doubts.
 
The Thriller said:
How the hell are we playing .500 ball?

What's our record again?

We are 18 games below .500. Even if you took out all those games which Trey missed we would be below .500.

We are 4-6 in our last 10. That's not .500 ball.

Is Miami playing sub .500 ball? OKC? Indy?

Am I on bizarro world now?

Seriously, how can anyone argue that we are playing .500 ball? I don't get it
Click to expand...

You do of course realize that I'm saying that we aren't playing .500 ball…right?

Oh screw it, I don't know why I even bother with you.
 
Core4 said:
I kind of get the argument. Take away the 1-14 start and the Jazz are 20-25. Stretch that over the entire season and it's still just 36-46. Injuries? Every team deals with them. I'm too lazy to look it up, but deduct for those 15 games and I'll bet the Jazz don't have an alarming number of games missed to injuries.

The other caveat is that you can't entirely dismiss the 1-14 start. It was a BRUTAL schedule with more away games than home, and a very tough SOS. Even with Burke, Evans and Williams all healthy from Day 1, I'd suggest the record may only have improved 3-5 games.

So let's be generous and give the Jazz 5 more wins over that stretch. They're now 26-34 with a winning % of .433. That translates to a 35-47 record.

Would 35-36 wins be overachieving with this squad? Remember, in both scenarios we've completely removed the effects of having Harris, Tinsley and Lucas in the lineup.
Click to expand...

Even if you put us at 20-25, it's not .500.

There is no argument.
 
20-25 or whatever the sticklers came up with is close enough to .500.

Someone mentioned they are on pace for 36 & 46 if they had a point guard all season. 36 wins is HUGE outperformance, especially since the Jazz have had the league's toughest schedule all season. Give an average NBA schedule and they're clearly a .500+ team.

Pretty hard to deny Ty's hand in the magic of 36 wins. The guy can't do anything to win with those who've hated him from the start.
 
franklin said:
20-25 or whatever the sticklers came up with is close enough to .500.

Someone mentioned they are on pace for 36 & 46 if they had a point guard all season. 36 wins is HUGE outperformance, especially since the Jazz have had the league's toughest schedule all season. Give an average NBA schedule and they're clearly a .500+ team.

Pretty hard to deny Ty's hand in the magic of 36 wins. The guy can't do anything to win with those who've hated him from the start.
Click to expand...

It's 20-28 with Trey, I believe. Not close.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top