Sexual Favors
Well-Known Member
Less disengenuous than assuming that is what he was implying.
May be valid, but I would like to hear/see you elaborate as to how. His mom has a history of dissing Kanter publicly.
Less disengenuous than assuming that is what he was implying.
All of you who constantly say you are embarassed are a bunch of little girls. Sure, OP was over the top, but the comment is worthy of discussion. Why are so many people affraid to discuss things?
Kanter should be played as power forward, since none of them gaurd eachother anyways:
Aldridge - no D
Dirk - no D
Boozer - No D
Griffin - no D
Randolph - gets by because of Gasol.
Kevin Love - hahaha!
Ryan Anderson - hahahahahahaha
McRoberts - not a rim protector
Thad Young - quick off ball, but overmatched with bigger opponents
Manimal - athletic, but out of position a lot, and is over matched size wise.
David Lee - haha
Kanter should be played as power forward, since none of them gaurd eachother anyways:
Aldridge - no D
Dirk - no D
Boozer - No D
Griffin - no D
Randolph - gets by because of Gasol.
Kevin Love - hahaha!
Ryan Anderson - hahahahahahaha
McRoberts - not a rim protector
Thad Young - quick off ball, but overmatched with bigger opponents
Manimal - athletic, but out of position a lot, and is over matched size wise.
David Lee - haha
You are aware that if Favors and Kanter start together it doesn't matter what you call them, NBA players don't wear bracelets saying who has to guard you. A team can put their "center" or "PF" on Kanter. It's not like Kanter's lateral speed scares anyone from putting a center on him.
Yes. Match ups dictate everything. At the end of the day, they are bigs.
You are aware that if Favors and Kanter start together it doesn't matter what you call them, NBA players don't wear bracelets saying who has to guard you. A team can put their "center" or "PF" on Kanter. It's not like Kanter's lateral speed scares anyone from putting a center on him.
Everything else you said doesn't matter
But it does. Ty had hang ups about who and what Kanter was supposed to be, and it severely limited his playing time and development.
He is a big. But, if he is utilized, and thought of as a PF, he has more freedom to be more offensive minded, which is his strength. Not saying he shouldn't improve his D, he should. I am just saying, no one should be expecting him to be a rim protector and then faulting him when he is not. Time for Jazz fans, and teammates to celebrate the fact that we have a 6'11" big w/ touch, who also has a post game. Players like him are rare, yet it seems most people have given up on the kid. Dante is really raw as well, but the talent is real. Hope jazz fans don't put the same ridiculous expectations on him as well.
It was an off topic rant.
SolidNo, but if his ability to shoot from the perimeter makes their C go out to guard him, that will change.
I think Quin is a good enough coach to see and exploit that.
Yes, the coach should put him in the spots where he can be most effective. He should do things he's good at, and avoid trying to do things he can't.
You know how much of this is dependent on whether he's labeled PF or C on his bio? Nothing
May be valid, but I would like to hear/see you elaborate as to how. His mom has a history of dissing Kanter publicly.