Not advocating but in a trade I'd say Burke, Hayward and two #1's.
And then you'd probably have to be prepared to offer a max deal after 2014-15 season.
Too much. I give them Burke or Burks and draft picks. I'd give them our pick top 5 protected and Golden States pick. They can have rights to Neto also
You're betting the farm. Point is stacked right now, strongest position in the league.
Take Rondo off Celts hands and they are guaranteed a 1/3rd shot at Wiggims. Give them a guaranteed loser and couple picks with protection. And Burks for good measure.
That's right Rondo is an All-Star at the position with the most talent in the NBA - what does that tell you? He is also right up there with Paul and LeBron at making the players around him better.
My guess is out of the core players in Utah, Ainge would want Hayward - Boston would want Hayward. The Celtics are gonna suck big time next year and Ainge needs to throw a white boy who can ball at their fans to make them forget about how bad they are and that he traded two HOF'ers for nothing. I don't think there's any way around it.
Of course the smart move is to wait until he become a free agent after next year and throw max money at him.
Um, Corbin + Rondo = DISASTER.
Meh, taking Rondo off their hands gives them Parker, Wiggins, or Randle. That should be enough if they really want to part with Rondo.
I'd throw in Burks, Gobert, Burke, or Neto plus any combo of draft picks.
Just not giving them any of the C3 (Hayward, Kanter, Favors). Besides, you need a player like Hayward to compliment Rondo.
This is a great point. Doc Rivers couldn't handle Rondo...why would Corbin be able to?
Hell no to giving up an asset who's name isn't Burks or Burke for Rondo.
We completely agree.
Hell no to giving up an asset who's name isn't Burks or Burke for Rondo.