who would you rather trade out of Favors or Hayward

[Dr. Jones]

Favors sucks.

Keep Hayward.

Am I doing this right? What alternative universe does the OP live in?

 

[BabyPeterzz]

#BAKETHATMOTHERF*CKINGCAKE

 

[Stifle Tower]

Hayward. Why?
1. The Jazz are deeper at the wings: Hood and Burks can start
2. Bigs are harder to find, especially those who can effectively play the 4/5. If we didn't have Gobert, Favors would be our starting center. That's incredible versatility.
3. Favors has a better contract and I'm scared as hell Hayward is going to opt out and ask for $25M+. If Utah gets a wing in the draft, it might be worth exploring a trade for Gordon in the next 2 years.

 

[addictionary]

I don't think Hayward is going anywhere for the rest of his career. Jazz made sure of that. Maybe he plays for Lakers or some other big $ franchise that will bring him more advertisement money in the final years of his career as a veteran point forward.

 

[addictionary]

Favors is the perfect franchise player for the Jazz. Why would they trade him? I think you need to reconsider trading any of those two if you are stuck to this decision because of money. And I don't see anything bringing in any necessity to trade either other than money.

 

[addictionary]

If somehow **** comes down to this, I would say Hayward, because you would get more for him. I am perfectly certain that Favors will explode in another team because he will get out of his comfort zone in another team.

 

[Stifle Tower]

I don't think Hayward is going anywhere for the rest of his career. Jazz made sure of that. Maybe he plays for Lakers or some other big $ franchise that will bring him more advertisement money in the final years of his career as a veteran point forward.

How so? They only matched a contract that ties him to Utah for 2 more seasons. After that he's an unrestricted FA. And I seriously doubt they're committed to throwing a 30% max deal at him to ensure they're the highest bidders in 3 years.