What's new
By:

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

  • Total voters
    29
Here's a question. If Mueller didn't find enough to indict, and considering the high bar of high crimes and misdemeanors, what do you think is going to be uncovered in the report that really does anything to Trump? If you like Trump, anything short of a conviction equals full exoneration. If you don't like Trump, nothing will likely ever equal anything but full guilt. But what could possibly be in there that would lead to anything other than an "I told you so" moment?

To me this has become like his tax returns. Frankly there isn't going to be anything in his tax returns that will lead to anything meaningful. The odds of finding some strange numbers or business dealings that are bad enough to do something like impeach, but that the IRS find just fine, are very slim. Same with the Mueller report at this point.

Believe me I am in camp release the full report. I just don't really see what anyone thinks will come of it beyond what we have right now.

These 2 things are starting to feel more and more like the birther ******** with Obama.
 
Lost in the discussion of what Trump and his campaign did or didn't do, is talk of what he should have done, and should be doing now.

Here are the facts as I see them.

1. The Russians interfered in our election on behalf of the Republican candidate.

2. That campaign and candidate welcomed the interference.

3. The newly elected president took an oath of office to protect and defend the constitution and the nation it represents.

4. In encounter after encounter with the author and director of the interference, Putin, Trump defends not the nation he has sworn to defend, but the guy who is trying to undermine it and it's place in the world. The most egregious example was the Helsinki encounter, the most recent was just a week ago during a phone call.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...port-agreed-no-collusion-white-house-n1001706

The President, and his staff, continues to blame the previous administration for not doing more to stop the interference, while doing nothing. Why does he not call Putin out? Because his ego can't take admitting Russia helped him win? Because he believes the Kremlin more than the CIA and FBI?

He may not have conspired with Russia during the campaign, but he sure is falling short in performing his duties now. He and his supporters have created such division, by spinning the institutions that protect us, the FBI and CIA, as the enemy and true conspirators, and by slamming any news agency that disagrees with him as the enemy of the people.

I hope that we, as a nation, wake up soon, and start the process of "moving on" from the alternate reality of the Trump presidency.

#D.O.N. is the answer to all our challenges!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Red
LogGrad98 said:
Here's a question. If Mueller didn't find enough to indict.
Click to expand...

From what I understand he did find enough to indict a regular person but there is some kind of rule that makes its harder or impossible for him to indict a president. Also have heard that only the DOJ has the power/ability to indict so Mueller's hands were tied as it pertains to indictment

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
NPC D4617 said:
When you post trash like this it can only be summed up as gas lighting.
Click to expand...
Danger!, danger! Will Robinson!

No supporter of the president can ever use the term "gas lighting" without drawing attention to the concerted efforts he makes to gas light us all.

One Brow actually makes a good point. Which Republican is it that has accepted that the Russians attacked our democratic process? That the investigation did not have a complete understanding of that attack because of efforts to resist the investigation? That there is evidence of obstruction of justice by the President? Those were all findings in the executive summary of the report.

#D.O.N. is the answer to all our challenges!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
One Brow said:
You mean, CNN favors the center, because you just above said the far left doesn't count. I wish you could be a little more consistent here.
Click to expand...
Oh, so all Fox News has to do to become centrist in your eyes is to get some sort of fact wrong on a story about an ultra-right whacko that they (along with practically everyone else) disagrees with? Good to know.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Oh, so all Fox News has to do to become centrist in your eyes is to get some sort of fact wrong on a story about an ultra-right whacko that they (along with practically everyone else) disagrees with? Good to know.
Click to expand...

My eyes? I thought we were talking about your eyes.

I am curious who is so far to the right that Fox News disagrees with them, though.
 
One Brow said:
My eyes? I thought we were talking about your eyes.

I am curious who is so far to the right that Fox News disagrees with them, though.
Click to expand...
If we were talking about my eyes this debate would have been over a long time ago. And LOL that you think there is nobody to the right of Fox News. Goodbye.
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
If we were talking about my eyes this debate would have been over a long time ago. And LOL that you think there is nobody to the right of Fox News.
Click to expand...

No, I think there are people to the right of Fox News. What I asked is who was so far right that Fox thinks they are too far right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top