Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

[Hotdog]

The same reason no one will click that is the same reason you won't click on CNN or MSNBC. Nice logic, buddy.

SMH.

Im always clicking on those sites and linking them. Thats how I know they lean left. The media is monopolized by the left. There is no way around it.

 

[Zombie]

​

The only stuff that matters is the classified information. She could have sent the other stuff through personal email legally just fine. There is nothing wrong with sending personal emails through personal email. There is also nothing wrong with deleting your personal emails. I dont want every one to know all of my personal business, nor do you. People should not have access to all of your personal emails. The Classified stuff was turned over to the investigation.

Plus again you are not mad at all the other government officials that have done that over the years. There is a long list of people who have done that, you and others have never once said anything about those people and dont care.

But I also know that you have all these crazy conspiracies based on the crap people you listen to on the radio with no real evidence so its pointless to discuss it with you.

This whole scandal was a weird one. If I remember correctly it all stemmed from BENGHAZI!!! And then just kind of took on a life of its own. All of the over the top faux outrage followed right along.

 

[Harambe]

SMH.

Im always clicking on those sites and linking them. Thats how I know they lean left. The media is monopolized by the left. There is no way around it.

Right.

 

[Hotdog]

Nah. If Clinton would have obstructed the investigation like Trump did then she would have been prosecuted. So would Trump if he weren't president.
With Trump you CAN prove enough to indict, at least according to 379 lawyers, what you can't do is prosecute a sitting president in this case unfortunately

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Ok.

Ive seen this nonsense being pushed one too many times.

The idea that Hillary would have been prosecuted if she committed a crime, and it had nothing to do with her connections is complete BS.

You really trying to tell me that the ex Senator, Secretary of State, wife of Bill Clinton, and candidate for president of the united states and mega millionaire with a rich history of making connections, had zero connections, and couldnt possibly got out of getting in trouble due to who she is? Really bro? Really?

Its funny how you guys will complain about how rich white men get away with whatever they want. You will tell us all how corrupt parts of the government are, but when it comes to Hillary Clinton, well then everything was just squeaky clean and done by the book. Give me a ****ing break. Im so tired of your intellectual dishonesty.

 

[Harambe]

 

[fishonjazz]

Ok.

Ive seen this nonsense being pushed one too many times.

The idea that Hillary would have been prosecuted if she committed a crime, and it had nothing to do with her connections is complete BS.

You really trying to tell me that the ex Senator, Secretary of State, wife of Bill Clinton, and candidate for president of the united states and mega millionaire with a rich history of making connections, had zero connections, and couldnt possibly got out of getting in trouble due to who she is? Really bro? Really?

Its funny how you guys will complain about how rich white men get away with whatever they want. You will tell us all how corrupt parts of the government are, but when it comes to Hillary Clinton, well then everything was just squeaky clean and done by the book. Give me a ****ing break. Im so tired of your intellectual dishonesty.

Lol

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[NUMBERICA]

SMH.

Im always clicking on those sites and linking them. Thats how I know they lean left. The media is monopolized by the left. There is no way around it.

The truth is the enemy of the right-wing, so it can appear to a person that isn't good at identifying the truth that real(er) journalism appears more "left".

We live in an age where our beliefs increasingly dictate what the truth is when it should be the other way around, the right-wing isn't unique to this. But Fox news and talk-radio has no interest in the truth, and giving equal footing to Fox/talk radio and real journalism is a disservice to both the truth and to society.

I suggest using NPR, PBS, and the BBC if you find CNN and MSNBC too partisan. On that note, news shouldn't be beholden to profits, it's an easily-identifiable conflict of interest, and if you have a non-profit form of news that reflects the views of the right-wing favorably, I'm happy to examine it.

 

[NUMBERICA]

For the record, the Clintons are simply awful. There are obviously worse things, but the Clintons represent just about everything wrong with establishment American politics (though they aren't the worst [take a peak at the history of the people that led the charge on impeaching Bill - a veritable cesspool of characters]).

There is a reason that populism is surging here, and the Clintons aren't close to blameless.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

There are many left-biased networks, but CNN isn't one of them.

If this was the case you would have no problem showing me numerous instances where CNN missed the story to the right (I'm not currently aware of any such misses). They miss to the left very, very frequently. It's because they are heavily biased toward the left and the only people who can't see this are those who are heavily biased toward the left.

 

[NUMBERICA]

Trump telling McGahn to defy the judiciary committee's subpoena. This is after Barr (to be sure, a hand-picked Trump loyalist, vetted specifically to take down the report) refused to provide the judiciary committee with an unredacted report.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/07/us/politics/don-mcgahn-subpoena.html
https://www.npr.org/2019/05/06/7206...-for-attorney-general-barr-over-mueller-repor

Trump is challenging my fight against confirmation bias, because I have a tough time believing anything that would imply he's anything other than a cheap grifter that found his way to power because of insane privilege and a penchant for an entertaining brand of lowness and inhumanity.

 

[Harambe]

If this was the case you would have no problem showing me numerous instances where CNN missed the story to the right (I'm not currently aware of any such misses). They miss to the left very, very frequently. It's because they are heavily biased toward the left and the only people who can't see this are those who are heavily biased toward the left.

What stories did they miss? I think it's fair to ask if they missed them, why?

Help us look.

 

[One Brow]

If this was the case you would have no problem showing me numerous instances where CNN missed the story to the right (I'm not currently aware of any such misses). They miss to the left very, very frequently. It's because they are heavily biased toward the left and the only people who can't see this are those who are heavily biased toward the left.

I'm unaware of the definition of "miss to the left" and "miss to the right". If you define them, perhaps I can find that.