Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

[Zombie]

I disagree with 90% of AOC’s policies. Pre-crazy Republicans would have taken her on as a challenge, treated her respectfully, debated her on issues, and won said debates. Today’s Trump Republicans are just a pack of irrational rabid dogs. I think they are torn between wanting to kill her and wanting to **** her.

Bring back William F Buckley and Jack Kemp, bring back the intelligent and principled wing of the Republican Party. Bring back republicans who were respectful and honored the rule of law.

Sorry, speech over.

Thriller must have triggered me. Smiley smiles.

I agree with all of this except for the part where she would lose the debates. But that might be because I agree with 90% of her policies : )

 

[silesian]

I agree with all of this except for the part where she would lose the debates. But that might be because I agree with 90% of her policies : )

You and I could have a sensible debate on the issues. And still like each other at the end.

 

[Hotdog]

I agree with all of this except for the part where she would lose the debates. But that might be because I agree with 90% of her policies : )

Lmao

You agree with 90% AOC? Explains a lot.

Im curious, when the world doesnt end in 12 years what will be your new expiration date for earth? Lets just get your excuses out there now so we have it on record.

 

[silesian]

Lmao

You agree with 90% AOC? Explains a lot.

Im curious, when the world doesnt end in 12 years what will be your new expiration date for earth? Lets just get your excuses out there now so we have it on record.

NPC is back. Goodbye intelligent respectful debate.

Keep in mind that nothing triggers him. He is the dispassionate logical dude in the room. Our in house Leonard Nimoy.

 

[Hotdog]

Let me remind you clowns that I told you long before the Muller investigation was even over exactly how it was going to end. While you were saying the complete opposite and that Trump was done.

Facts matter, and the facts are you were wrong. So you dont get to go around call people dumb, when you were proven wrong.

When you guys start getting some things right thats when you credit.

 

[One Brow]

Let me remind you clowns that I told you long before the Muller investigation was even over exactly how it was going to end. While you were saying the complete opposite and that Trump was done.

We give you full credit for maintaining your lie despite reality. Well trolled.

 

[silesian]

Let me remind you clowns that I told you long before the Muller investigation was even over exactly how it was going to end. While you were saying the complete opposite and that Trump was done.

Facts matter, and the facts are you were wrong. So you dont get to go around call people dumb, when you were proven wrong.

When you guys start getting some things right thats when you credit.

The mueller report says that the Russians interfered and influenced the election. Did you predict this?

The mueller reported that trump staff repeatedly ignored his orders. Did you predict this?

The mueller report provided 10 examples of obstruction and could not exonerate trump on obstruction. He punted on the decision to indict. Did you predict this?

The mueller report proved that s sanders lied to the public. Did you predict that?

 

[Red]

Let me remind you clowns

Looking at your recently revamped avatar, I would have guessed you were a clown

 

[silesian]

I just thank god that trump struck that brilliant deal with North Korea. No more missile tests. Nukes are gone. Asia is safer. Trump wins Nobel peace prize. And Donnie and Kim Jong Un are in love. Thank god for the great leader and expert negotiator.


Yeah, we totally got played.

 

[gandalfe]

Bring back William F Buckley and Jack Kemp, bring back the intelligent and principled wing of the Republican Party. Bring back republicans who were respectful and honored the rule of law.

Ah, the always level headed Buckley...

Now listen, you queer, stop calling me a crypto-Nazi, or I'll nail you in the goddamn face and you'll stay plastered.

 

[Red]

A member of the House Judiciary Committee announced on Fox News Sunday that the committee was hoping to hear testimony from Mueller on May 15th, although it has not been finalized. However, this caused Trump to tweet that he does not want Mueller to testify in the House, despite saying, yesterday I believe, that he would leave that decision to AG Barr:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/tentative-date-muellers-house-panel-testimony-160651159--politics.html

 

[Hotdog]

I think you guys should watch this

 

[firegirl]

It's quite entertaining watching all of you measuring each other's dicks.

None of you have changed your opinion. Not even by a hair. Why do you keep fighting over this? No one on either side is changing.

Why not focus on a middle ground? Something in common? Are you both so far gone that you can't meet in the middle?


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

 

[Hotdog]

It's quite entertaining watching all of you measuring each other's dicks.

None of you have changed your opinion. Not even by a hair. Why do you keep fighting over this? No one on either side is changing.

Why not focus on a middle ground? Something in common? Are you both so far gone that you can't meet in the middle?


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

Ive tried. The Democrats are stuck on stupid.

I will give you an example. I've pointed out that there is a left leaning media bias from CNN and others and there is a right leaning bias from fox news and others. But these clowns will dig right in and deny there is any kind of left leaning bias and its only Fox news.

The left has no interest in solving anything. That is made clear in how they attack free speech and literally refuse to have debates.

How many right leaning types around here have you seen say they are putting people on ignore? Its none. Its all the lefties. Its a lefty issue. They are smug and think they know it all.

 

[framer]

The mueller report says that the Russians interfered and influenced the election. Did you predict this?

The mueller reported that trump staff repeatedly ignored his orders. Did you predict this?

The mueller report provided 10 examples of obstruction and could not exonerate trump on obstruction. He punted on the decision to indict. Did you predict this?

The mueller report proved that s sanders lied to the public. Did you predict that?

In real life, deciding not to indict means that not enough evidence exists to indict. There is no "well the evidence was there to indict, but they just decided not to." Mueller found no evidence of collusion, nor did he find enough evidence to recommend indictment. That's the facts. Everything else is various shades of editorializing, which usually isn't allowed in a grand jury report made public. And yet, it was released without objection by the DOJ.

Also I am going to need sourcing on the "Russia INFLUENCED the election" angle you trot out as a fact.

 

[LogGrad98]

What kind of influence did Russia have on the election? 10%? 50%? Were enough votes swayed to change the outcome? Can it be proven?

I have no doubt they did what they could to interfere, I'm interested in how much of an effect it actually had. Or is there no way to tell?

 

[One Brow]

I've pointed out that there is a left leaning media bias from CNN and others and there is a right leaning bias from fox news and others. But these clowns will dig right in and deny there is any kind of left leaning bias and its only Fox news.

Literally no one takes the position that only Fox news has bias. There is a difference between trolling and lying.

CNN's bias, as I have said before, is toward sensationalism. Any left-right bias is dwarfed by that. There are many left-biased networks, but CNN isn't one of them.

 

[One Brow]

In real life, deciding not to indict means that not enough evidence exists to indict.

Or that you don't indict because policy so forbids. The DOJ is not allowed to indict a sitting President, by policy.

Mueller found no evidence of collusion,

There are dozens of instances of collusion.

nor did he find enough evidence to recommend indictment.

He recommended indictment on five separate incidents.

That's the facts.

Those were lies. I don't think you are lying, but that you are repeating lies you have been told by whatever your sources are.

Everything else is various shades of editorializing, which usually isn't allowed in a grand jury report made public. And yet, it was released without objection by the DOJ.

All of the grand jury information was redacted, that is, not released.

Also I am going to need sourcing on the "Russia INFLUENCED the election" angle you trot out as a fact.

Really, there is so much there is you care to look. How much "sourcing" do you require? Can we start with the multiple indictments by Mueller of Russian nationals? Do you need more than that?

 

[One Brow]

What kind of influence did Russia have on the election? 10%? 50%? Were enough votes swayed to change the outcome? Can it be proven?

I have no doubt they did what they could to interfere, I'm interested in how much of an effect it actually had. Or is there no way to tell?

I don't think that anyone can give you a percentage. In an election decided by a total of 80,000 votes spread among three states, not much of an effect was needed.

 

[LogGrad98]

I don't think that anyone can give you a percentage. In an election decided by a total of 80,000 votes spread among three states, not much of an effect was needed.

Agreed.

Is your opinion that if Russia had not interfered the outcome would have been different?