Would you guys trade Favors to Sacramento?
- Thread starter Justys
- Start date
Would I trade Favors to Sacramento for Nik Stauskas and that other crap?
No, I wouldn't personally.
Edit: Oh I see they'd include their 1st-round pick this year, likely going to be in the 10 - 12 range. That would be Favors for Stauskas, Thompson, and maybe Booker or Lyles.
So again, I'd say no. That would set us back a few years for no gain.
No, I wouldn't personally.
Edit: Oh I see they'd include their 1st-round pick this year, likely going to be in the 10 - 12 range. That would be Favors for Stauskas, Thompson, and maybe Booker or Lyles.
So again, I'd say no. That would set us back a few years for no gain.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
So we're trying to accommodate a guy who can't pass, plays suspect defense and wants out of town. And getting rid of a player who has expressed his love of the state, showed his loyalty by quickly signing for under market value, and has already developed a good rapport with Gobert and Hayward. Perhaps Favors doesn't have quite the range nor the rebounding prowess of Enes. But he's a force on BOTH ends. He's also improved his game every season - despite having the same coaches as Enes. This one isn't even close...you keep Favors.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
Wow you have got to be kidding.
I think Sac loses their first round pick this year
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
I wouldn't trade Kanter for that deal. Unless that pick is unprotected. Then I might. But Favors I'd hang up before they got to the stuff they were offering.
Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Once the Jazz have a winning record, I think Hayward and Favors (and Gobert) start to get some all-star consideration. With Kanter leaving, Favors becomes almost untouchable. We'd go from having a great 4/5 rotation to having one big + Booker who may/may not remain. Even at that, Booker is not a quality starter.
