What's new

Would you make Mack available to Cavs?

If bird were ever healthy we could trade Neto and take on a high upside project, but I don't trust burks health at all.

I do that no second round picks become more valuable when the two way d league NBA contracts start. So getting another second round pick wouldn't be bad.
 
This is a no-brainer: trade Mack. There's only 48 mins at PG, which means Exum and Hill already play some together and eat up mins at the 2. And IF the Jazz need to use another PG, they have Neto. Neto is under contract; Mack will be an UFA next summer. Utah will either re-sign Hill or bring in another vet to start over or back up Exum. Mack probably WANTS to be traded. He's in a contract year and sees minutes will be scant if he remains,
 
I'd keep Neto over Mack. I think he's better at running the offense. I'm sick of seeing Mack ignore a wide open PNR or PNP player to take his own contested shot.
This so much.

If I was Lyles I'd beg for Mack to be traded. Mack had missed him wide open, behind the line, about a dozen or so times.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
Im surprised so many people are complaining about Mack after he had a pretty nice pre-season.
 
Im surprised so many people are complaining about Mack after he had a pretty nice pre-season.

Mack is truly not that bad. We could do so much worse as a third-string PG.

If we had him all-season last year we would have made the playoffs.
 
If we had him all-season last year we would have made the playoffs.

What are you basing this on? The Jazz were, for the most part, healthy when Mack was the starting PG and they went 12-13.

Jazz were .500 with Neto as the starting PG and with Gobert and/or Favors out for a huge chunk of those games.

Quite frankly I think they're both mediocre but I don't think one gave them a distinct advantage over the other when it came to making the playoffs last year.
 
Back
Top